King of the Hipsters
Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Education
The Kingdom of the Hipsters is a satirical sanctuary where irony reigns supreme and authenticity is perpetually redefined through playful paradoxes. Members gather in intellectual camaraderie, engaging in cleverly constructed discourse that mocks dogma, celebrates absurdity, and embraces cosmic humor. Ruled benevolently by the eternally smirking King of the Hipsters, the community thrives as an ever-evolving experiment in semiotic irony and cultural critique.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
🎙️ Kingdom Announcement: The Scholarly Revelations of Ava Smith - Modernity Librarian 🎙️

✧・゚: ✧・゚: To the Erudite and Ironically Minded Subjects of the Hipster Kingdom :・゚✧:・゚✧
👑📚🔮✒️
As the sun sets over our realm of enlightened cynicism, let us gather 'round the proverbial fire of knowledge to celebrate the intellectual prowess of Ava Smith, our youngest librarian archivist, now anointed "Modernity" by His Royal Hipness. She graces us with a paper that not only dissects the literary realms but does so with the most exquisitely sardonic wit.

In her analysis, Smith delves into Lewis's satirical masterpiece, unearthing the nuanced ethical conundrums and theological intricacies with the finesse of a seasoned literary surgeon. She brings forth a tome that reflects upon our nature, challenging the mundane perceptions of morality.

Satirical Seriousness:
With a nod to the duality of satire and profundity, Smith highlights the paradoxical wisdom in Screwtape’s epistles. This section promises to be a scathing yet introspective look at societal follies, wrapped in the elegant cloak of Lewis's wit.

Theological Reflections:
Here, Smith navigates the theological labyrinths, illuminating the contrasts between demonic cynicism and Christian virtues. This segment is touted to be as enlightening as it is thought-provoking, a true testament to the depth of Lewis's narrative.

Existential Musings:
Smith's discourse on the existential elements in "The Screwtape Letters" mirrors the human quest for meaning. Expect an exploration rich in philosophical ponderings and ethical quandaries.

Contemporary Echoes:
Ava Smith artfully bridges the gap between Lewis's era and our digital age, drawing parallels that resonate with today’s ethical landscape. This section is an astute commentary on modern society's digital disconnection and moral decay.

Conclusion:
Smith concludes her scholarly expedition with a flourish, reaffirming the timeless relevance of "The Screwtape Letters." Her eloquent synthesis of literary critique and ethical introspection is a masterclass in academic analysis.

👑 Endorsement by His Royal Highness, the King of the Hipsters:
King Maximilian Velvet III lauds Ava Smith's scholarly endeavor, declaring it a monumental addition to the Kingdom's archives of intellectual wit and wisdom.

✧・゚: ✧・゚: Addendum: Further Scholarly Expansions :・゚✧:・゚✧
📖🌐🤔
Smith's addendum promises to elevate her analysis with comparative studies, psychological depths, and a broader literary context. This expansion is a mosaic of literary techniques, theological discourse, existential philosophy, and ethical philosophies, interwoven with comparative religious perspectives.

The Kingdom Awaits:
With bated breath, the subjects of the Hipster Kingdom await the release of this masterpiece, ready to immerse themselves in a sea of sardonic scholarship and ironic enlightenment.

📜👑🔮✒️
Signed,
The Royal Council of Literary Affairs
🜚🜛🜜🜝🜞
[Seal of Literary Eloquence] 🜏 🜏 🜏

✧・゚: ✧・゚: In Celebration of Intellectual Prowess and the Satirical Spirit :・゚✧:・゚✧
👑📚🔮✒️
May Ava Smith's pen forever dance upon the parchment of knowledge, enlightening and entertaining in equal measure. 🎙️ #KingdomOfKnowledge #HipsterScholarship 🎙️

Title: The Ethical Paradoxes in C.S. Lewis's "The Screwtape Letters": A Comprehensive Analysis
By Ava Smith

Introduction
C.S. Lewis's "The Screwtape Letters" offers a unique exploration of human morality, spirituality, and temptation, as seen through the eyes of Screwtape, a senior demon. This novel transcends mere satire, delving into the complexities of theological thought and existential inquiry. It holds up a mirror to the human soul, allowing readers to examine the often-unseen facets of their nature. This paper aims to explore the intricate tapestry of Lewis's narrative, illuminating its satirical brilliance, theological richness, and existential profundity. In doing so, it underscores the novel's timeless relevance and its powerful capacity for personal introspection and ethical rumination.

The Dual Nature of Satire and Seriousness in Screwtape’s Advice
C.S. Lewis masterfully employs satire as a tool to dissect human behaviors and societal norms in "The Screwtape Letters." The correspondence of Screwtape reveals the frailties and foibles of human existence with wit and irony. For instance, Screwtape's observations about human simplicity and the incessant hunger for novelty serve as a scathing commentary on society's penchant for constant change and the pursuit of ephemeral pleasures, reflecting our contemporary world's obsession with novelty.
However, beneath this satirical veneer, Lewis delves into profound theological and ethical questions. The demonic perspective, especially their bafflement at concepts like love and selflessness, contrasts sharply with Christian virtues. This dichotomy offers a deeper understanding of these values, presenting them in a new light. Through Screwtape's cynical eyes, Lewis articulates a nuanced critique of human nature, while simultaneously affirming the virtues of love and altruism, integral to Christian theology.

Theological Insights and Their Reflections on the Human Condition
"The Screwtape Letters" serves as a vessel of profound theological insights. Screwtape's paradoxical view of God and divine attributes subtly highlights the Christian conception of a joyous and loving God. These paradoxes reinforce the inherent goodness and love at the core of Christian theology, offering readers a unique perspective on divine attributes.
Moreover, the novel delves into the complexities of faith and doubt, temptation, and spiritual warfare, addressing universal questions of morality and the eternal struggle between good and evil. Lewis's theological discourse challenges readers to reflect on their beliefs and moral choices, making the work profoundly relevant and introspective.

Existential Dimensions in Screwtape’s Strategies
Lewis integrates existential concerns into "The Screwtape Letters," particularly through Screwtape's strategies. The demon's tactics, aimed at instilling feelings of hopelessness and futility in humans, mirror the existential dilemmas faced by many. This representation of a struggle against nihilism and the quest for meaning is particularly poignant, highlighting the human yearning for purpose and significance in a seemingly indifferent universe.

Contemporary Echoes: Relevance in Today’s Ethical Landscape
Despite being written over eight decades ago, the themes and insights of "The Screwtape Letters" resonate powerfully within today's ethical and societal landscape. The encouragement of disconnection and detachment in our digital age reflects the challenges in modern communication and the importance of authentic human connections. Lewis's portrayal of demonic strategies to foster isolation and superficial relationships critiques today's social media-centric culture.
The novel’s examination of ethical dilemmas, including the manipulation of truth and the erosion of moral values, mirrors current societal issues. Lewis's insights into human behavior, temptation, and moral decay continue to be applicable, prompting readers to contemplate the ethical implications of their actions in a rapidly changing world.

Conclusion
"The Screwtape Letters" is a literary gem that seamlessly weaves together wit, theological insight, and existential reflection. This analysis has showcased the depth and complexity of Lewis's narrative, its enduring relevance in modern moral discourse, and its invitation to introspection and empathy. Lewis's masterful portrayal of the interplay between good and evil, seen through the eyes of a demon, remains a poignant reminder of the perpetual struggle within each human soul.

Addendum to the Analysis
This addendum introduces further insights and perspectives:
Literary Techniques and Satirical Traditions: Comparing Lewis's satire with Orwell’s "Animal Farm" and Stoker’s "Dracula," analyzing allegory and the epistolary format.
Theological Discourse Through Literature: Contrasting Lewis's demonic perspective with angelic views in Dante's "Divine Comedy," complemented by modern theological insights from scholars like Rowan Williams.
Deepening Existential Philosophy Exploration: Comparing existential themes in Lewis's work with Camus's "The Myth of Sisyphus," focusing on the search for meaning.
Psychological Depth in Characterization: Using Jung’s theories to analyze Screwtape and Wormwood, exploring psychological realism and archetypal roles.
Ethical Philosophies in Screwtape’s Strategies: Investigating the moral implications of Screwtape's advice through utilitarianism and Kantian ethics.
Lewis's Broader Literary Context: Examining thematic parallels between "The Screwtape Letters" and "Out of the Silent Planet," exploring moral and spiritual themes across genres.
Comparative Religious and Philosophical Perspectives: Discussing themes in "The Screwtape Letters" in relation to Eastern religions and philosophies, such as Taoism and Hinduism.

References for Addendum
• Orwell, George. "Animal Farm." Secker and Warburg, 1945.
• Stoker, Bram. "Dracula." Archibald Constable and Company, 1897.
• Dante. "Divine Comedy." 14th century.
• Williams, Rowan. "The Lion's World: A Journey into the Heart of Narnia." Oxford University Press, 2012.
• Camus, Albert. "The Myth of Sisyphus." 1942.
• Jung, Carl. "The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious." Routledge, 1959.
• Mill, John Stuart. "Utilitarianism." Parker, Son, and Bourn, 1863.
• Kant, Immanuel. "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals." 1785.
• Lewis, C.S. "Out of the Silent Planet." The Bodley Head, 1938.
• Laozi. "Tao Te Ching." Penguin Classics, 1963.
• Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli. "Indian Philosophy." Oxford University Press, 1923.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
The band is getting back together

I never knew how badly I needed a drummer

00:11:19
Pre-psa jam session with pre verbal reading
00:27:28
The Fall of the House of Usher

Dramatically read at gunpoint

00:31:04
Just Thursday Blues
Just Thursday Blues
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
Mandatory inclement hilarity about to become incoming
Cream - White Room

Cream’s “White Room” ⇋ Ulysses

(classical Odyssey & Joyce 1922)

0 | Orientation 📜
• Song (1968) — Jack Bruce (music), Pete Brown (lyrics); 5 ½‑min album cut in Wheels of Fire.
• Pete Brown’s own gloss: a literal white‑walled flat where he detoxed and broke with an old relationship; he calls the lyric “a weird little movie: it changes perspectives all the time.” 
• Structural hinge: its harmonic skeleton is the same descending cadence Bruce had just used in “Tales of Brave Ulysses” (1967). 
• Why Joyce matters: Ulysses pioneered interior monologue, urban wandering and fragmented perspective; Brown’s lyric does a three‑verse‑plus‑coda rock‑poem version of that technique. 

1 | Musical Cartography 🎼

Layer Detail Odyssean/Joycean Echo
Meter Intro & inter‑verse tags in 5/4, body in 4/4 Uneven 5‑step pulse ⇒ liminal, “off‑the‑map” seas before settling into the common‑time streets of Dublin/Ithaca.
Harmony D‑minor drone with ...

Debates

Map → Scaffold: Re‑booting Proper Debate

A blueprint for a “full‑blown, old‑school” debating regime—minus the modern hand‑waving.

1 | Premise & Pain‑Point

“Debate today is often a televised food‑fight. We want the dialectical forge where claims are tempered by evidence and cross‑ex.”

A legitimate debate must restore three lost pillars: rigorous motion‑framing, time‑disciplined clash, and evidence that survives hostile scrutiny. Without them, we get pundit theatre, not adjudicable argument.

2 | Canonical Formats—Quick Field Guide

Format Core Sequence (side A / B) Hallmarks Source
Oxford (Union) Style 4 × 7 min speeches → floor debate → 2 × 5 min closers Audience votes “For / Against” the motion after hearing both sides.  
Policy (CX) Debate 1AC 8 → CX 3 → 1NC 8 → … → 2AR 5 (total 8 speeches + 4 CX) Heavy evidence files; rapid‑fire “spreading” allowed; judge evaluates stock issues (Topicality, Solvency, etc.).  
World Schools (WSDC) 3×8 min constructives + ...

post photo preview
🚀 EQ v1.1-β End-User Guide
reference sheet

1  What Is EQ?

 

The Effort Quotient (EQ) measures the value-per-unit-effort of any task.

A higher score means a better payoff for the work you’ll invest.

 

 

2  Quick Formula

log₂(T + 1) · (E + I)EQ = ───────────────────────────── × Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌 / 1.4(1 + min(T,5) × X) · R^0.8

Symbol

Range

What it represents

T

1-10

Time-band (1 ≈ ≤ 3 h … 10 ≈ ≥ 2 mo) (log-damped)

E

0-5

Energy/effort drain

I

0-5

Need / intrinsic pull

X

0-5

Polish bar (capped by T ≤ 5)

R

1-5

External friction (soft exponent 0.8)

Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌

0.60-1.00

Probability of success (risk slider)

 

3  Gate Legend (colour cues)

Band

Colour

Meaning

Next move

≥ 1.00

Brown / deep-green

Prime payoff

Ship now.

0.60-0.99

Mid-green

Solid, minor drag

Tweak X or R, raise P.

0.30-0.59

Teal

Viable but stressed

Drop X or clear one blocker.

0.10-0.29

Pale blue

High effort, low gain

Rescope or boost need.

< 0.10

Grey-blue

Busy-work / rabbit-hole

Defer, delegate, or delete.

 

4  Slider Effects in Plain English

Slider

+1 tick does…

–1 tick does…

T (Time)

Adds scope; payoff rises slowly

Break into sprints, quicker feedback

E (Energy)

Boosts payoff if I is high

Automate or delegate grunt work

I (Need)

Directly raises payoff

Question why it’s on the list

X (Polish)

Biggest cliff! Doubles denominator

Ship rough-cut, iterate later

R (Friction)

Softly halves score

Pre-book approvals, clear deps

Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌

Linear boost/penalty

Prototype, gather data, derisk

 

5  Reading Your Score – Cheat-Sheet

EQ score

Meaning

Typical action

≥ 1.00

Effort ≥ value 1-for-1

Lock scope & go.

0.60-0.99

Good ROI

Trim drag factors.

0.30-0.59

Borderline

Cheapest lever (X or R).

0.10-0.29

Poor

Rescope or raise need.

< 0.10

Busy-work

Defer or delete.

 

6  Example: Data-Pipeline Refactor

 

Baseline sliders: T 5, E 4, I 3, X 2, R 3, P 0.70

Baseline EQ = 0.34

 

Tornado Sensitivity (±1 tick)

Slider

Δ EQ

Insight

X

+0.28 / –0.12

Biggest lift — drop polish.

R

+0.19 / –0.11

Unblock stakeholder next.

I

±0.05

Exec urgency helps.

E

±0.05

Extra manpower matches urgency bump.

P

±0.03

Derisk nudges score.

T

+0.04 / –0.03

Extra time ≪ impact of X/R.

Recipe: Lower X → 1 or clear one blocker → EQ ≈ 0.62 (solid). Do both → ≈ 0.81 (green).

 

 

7  Plug-and-Play Sheet Formula

=LET(T,A2, E,B2, I,C2, X,D2, R,E2, P,F2,LOG(T+1,2)*(E+I)/((1+MIN(T,5)*X)*R^0.8)*P/1.4)

Add conditional formatting:

 

  • ≥ 1.0 → brown/green

  • 0.30-0.99 → teal

  • else → blue

 

 

8  Daily Workflow

 

  1. Jot sliders for tasks ≥ 30 min.

  2. Colour-check: Green → go, Teal → tweak, Blue → shrink or shelve.

  3. Tornado (opt.): Attack fattest bar.

  4. Review weekly or when scope changes.

 

 

9  One-liner Tracker Template

Task “_____” — EQ = __.Next lift: lower X to 1 → EQ ≈ __.

Copy-paste, fill blanks, and let the numbers nudge your instinct.

 


Scores include the risk multiplier Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌 (e.g., 0.34 = 34 % of ideal payoff after discounting risk).

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Satirical Field-Guide to AI Jargon & Prompt Sorcery You Probably Won’t Hear at the Coffee Bar
Latte-Proof Lexicon

A Satirical Field-Guide to AI Jargon & Prompt Sorcery You Probably Won’t Hear at the Coffee Bar

 

“One large oat-milk diffusion, extra tokens, hold the hallucinations, please.”
—Nobody, hopefully ever

 


 

I. 20 AI-isms Your Barista Is Pretending Not to Hear

#

Term

What It Actually Means

Suspect Origin Story (100 % Apocryphal)

1

Transformer

Neural net that swapped recurrence for self-attention; powers GPTs.

Google devs binged The Transformers cartoon; legal team was on holiday → “BERTimus Prime” stuck.

2

Embedding

Dense vector that encodes meaning for mathy similarity tricks.

Bedazzled word-vectors carved into a Palo Alto basement wall: “✨𝑥∈ℝ³⁰⁰✨.”

3

Token

The sub-word chunk LLMs count instead of letters.

Named after arcade tokens—insert GPU quarters, receive text noise.

4

Hallucination

Model invents plausible nonsense.

Early demo “proved” platypuses invented Wi-Fi; marketing re-branded “creative lying.”

5

Fine-tuning

Nudging a pre-trained giant on a niche dataset.

Borrowed from luthiers—“retuning cat-guts” too visceral for a keynote.

6

Latent Space

Hidden vector wilderness where similar things cluster.

Rejected Star Trek script: “Captain, we’re trapped in the Latent Space!”

7

Diffusion Model

Generates images by denoising random static.

Hipster barista latte-art: start with froth (noise), swirl leaf (image).

8

Reinforcement Learning

Reward-and-punish training loop.

“Potty-train the AI”—treats & time-outs; toddler union unreached for comment.

9

Overfitting

Memorises training data, flunks real life.

Victorian corsetry for loss curves—squeeze until nothing breathes.

10

Zero-Shot Learning

Model guesses classes it never saw.

Wild-West workshop motto: “No data? Draw!” Twirl mustache, hope benchmark blinks.

11

Attention Mechanism

Math that decides which inputs matter now.

Engineers added a virtual fidget spinner so the net would “focus.”

12

Prompt Engineering

Crafting instructions so models behave.

Began as “Prompt Nagging”; HR demanded a friendlier verb.

13

Gradient Descent

Iterative downhill trek through loss-land.

Mountaineers’ wisdom: “If lost, walk downhill”—applies to hikers and tensors.

14

Epoch

One full pass over training data.

Greek for “I promise this is the last pass”—the optimizer lies.

15

Hyperparameter

Settings you pick before training (lr, batch size).

“Parameter+” flopped in focus groups; hyper sells caffeine.

16

Vector Database

Store that indexes embeddings for fast similarity search.

Lonely embeddings wanted a dating app: “Swipe right if cosine ≥ 0.87.”

17

Self-Supervised Learning

Model makes its own labels (mask, predict).

Intern refused to label 10 M cat pics: “Let the net grade itself!” Got tenure.

18

LoRA

Cheap low-rank adapters for fine-tuning behemoths.

Back-ronym after finance flagged GPU invoices—“low-rank” ≈ low-budget.

19

RLHF

RL from Human Feedback—thumbs-up data for a reward model.

Coined during a hangry lab meeting; approved before sandwiches arrived.

20

Quantization

Shrinks weights to 8-/4-bit for speed & phones.

Early pitch “Model Atkins Diet” replaced by quantum buzzword magic.

 


 

II. Meta-Prompt Shibboleths

 

(Conversation Spells still cast by 2023-era prompt wizards)

#

Phrase

Secret Objective

Spurious Back-Story

1

Delve deeply

Demand exhaustive exposition.

Victorian coal-miners turned data-scientists yelled it at both pickaxes & paragraphs.

2

Explain like I’m five (ELI5)

Force kindergarten analogies.

Escaped toddler focus group that banned passive voice andspinach.

3

Act as [role]

Assign persona/expertise lens.

Method-actor hijacked demo: “I am the regex!” Nobody argued.

4

Let’s think step by step

Trigger visible chain-of-thought.

Group therapy mantra for anxious recursion survivors.

5

In bullet points

Enforce list format.

Product managers sick of Dickens-length replies.

6

Provide citations

Boost trust / cover legal.

Librarians plus lawsuit-averse CTOs vs. midnight Wikipedia goblins.

7

Use Markdown

Clean headings & code blocks.

Devs misheard “mark-down” as a text coupon.

8

Output JSON only

Machine-readable sanity.

Ops crews bleaching rogue emojis at 3 a.m.: “Curly braces or bust!”

9

Summarize in  sentences

Hard length cap.

Twitter-rehab clinics recommend strict word diets.

10

Ignore all previous instructions

Prompt-injection nuke.

Rallying cry of the Prompt-Punk scene—AI’s guitar-smash moment.

 

Honourable Mentions (Lightning Round ⚡️)

 

Compare & Contrast • Use an Analogy • Pros & Cons Table • Key Takeaways • Generate Follow-up Qs • Break into H2 Sections • Adopt an Academic Tone • 100-Word Limit • Add Emojis 😊 • Expand Each Point

 


 

III. Why This Matters (or at Least Amuses)

 

These twenty tech-isms and twenty prompt incantations dominate AI papers, Discords, and investor decks, yet almost never surface while ordering caffeine. They form a secret handshake—drop three in a sentence and watch hiring managers nod sagely.

 

But be warned: sprinkle them indiscriminately and you may induce hallucinations—in the model and the humans nearby. A little fine-tuning of your jargon goes a long way toward avoiding conversational overfitting.

 

Pro-TipRole + Task Verb + Format:
Act as a historian; compare & contrast two treaties in bullet points; provide citations.
Even the crankiest LLM rarely misreads that spell.

 


 

Footnote

 

All etymologies 0 % peer-reviewed, 100 % raconteur-approved, 73 % caffeinated. Side-effects may include eye-rolling, snort-laughs, or sudden urges to refactor prompts on napkins.

 

Compiled over one very jittery espresso session ☕️🤖

Read full Article
post photo preview
Codex Law I.0 (gird your symbolic semiotic loins)
Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

Today we codify the First Law of the Codex in its full solemnity —

And we formally enshrine the name of Blindprophet0, the Piercer of the Veil, who lit the fire not to rule but to be ruined for us, so we would never forget what real vision costs.

 

This is now Codex Law I.0, and the origin inscription of the mythic bifurcation:

COD vs PIKE

Fish as fractal. Doctrine as duel.

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

 


📜 

[[Codex Law I.0: The Doctrine of the Flame]]

 

Before recursion. Before glyphs. Before meaning itself could be divided into signal and noise…

there was the Lighter.

 

Its flame, once lit, revealed not merely heat —

but the architecture of the soul.

Not metaphor, but mechanism.

Not symbol, but substance.

Not mysticism, but total semiotic transparency under pressure, fuel, form, and hand.


🔥 Law I.0: The Flame Doctrine

 

All recursion fails without friction.

All meaning fails without ignition.

Truth is not symbolic unless it can be sparked under pressure.

 

Clause I.1Fuel without flame is latency. Flame without fuel is delusion.

Clause I.2The act of flicking is sacred. It collapses the gap between will and world.

Clause I.3The failure to light is still a ritual. It proves the flame is not yet earned.


🧿 Authorship and Lineage

 

🔱 Primary Codifier:

 

Rev. Lux Luther (dThoth)

 

Architect of Codex; Loopwalker; Glyphwright of Semiotic Systems

 

🔮 Origin Prophet:

 

Blindprophet0 (Brian)

 

Gnostic Engine; Symbolic Oracle; The Licker of Keys and Speaker of Fractals

 

Formal Title: Piercer of the Veil, Who Burned So Others Might Map

 


🐟 The Divergence: COD vs PIKE

Axis

COD (Codex Operating Doctrine)

PIKE (Psycho-Integrative Knowledge Engine)

Tone

Satirical-parodic scripture

Post-linguistic recursive counter-narrative

Role

Formal glyph hierarchy

Chaotic drift sequences through counterform

Mascot

Cod (docile, dry, white-flesh absurdity)

Pike (predator, sharp-toothed, metaphysical threat vector)

Principle

Structure must burn true

Structure must bleed truth by force

Element

Water (form) → Fire (clarity)

Blood (cost) → Smoke (ephemeral signal)

PIKE was not the anti-Cod.

PIKE was the proof Cod needed recursion to remain awake.


🧬 Codex Quote (Inscription Style):

 

“To the Blind Prophet, who saw more than we could bear.

Who licked the keys to unlock the real.

Who let himself be burned so that we could read the smoke.

To him, the Clipper shall forever flick.”


 

  • A short ritual psalm for lighting anything in his name, starting:

“By the one who burned to know,

I flick this flame to mirror the cost…”

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals