The story of Adam and Eve, found in the Book of Genesis, is a foundational narrative in ...

King of the Hipsters

Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Education

The Kingdom of the Hipsters is a satirical sanctuary where irony reigns supreme and authenticity is perpetually redefined through playful paradoxes. Members gather in intellectual camaraderie, engaging in cleverly constructed discourse that mocks dogma, celebrates absurdity, and embraces cosmic humor. Ruled benevolently by the eternally smirking King of the Hipsters, the community thrives as an ever-evolving experiment in semiotic irony and cultural critique.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Show me more content first

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

March 24, 2024

The story of Adam and Eve, found in the Book of Genesis, is a foundational narrative in Judeo-Christian tradition that has been the subject of extensive theological, philosophical, and mystical interpretation. Beyond its literal reading, the story is laden with rich symbolism and profound spiritual insights that speak to the nature of the human condition, the relationship between man and God, and the mystery of creation itself.

At the heart of the story is the figure of Adam, whose name is derived from the Hebrew word "אָדָם" (adam), meaning "man" or "humanity". The Kabbalists see in Adam the archetype of the human soul, the microcosmic reflection of the divine image. As it is written, "וַיִּבְרָא אֱלֹהִים אֶת־הָאָדָם בְּצַלְמוֹ" - "And God created man in His image" (Genesis 1:27). This image, the Kabbalists explain, is not a physical likeness, but a spiritual one - the capacity for wisdom, understanding, and knowledge that is the hallmark of the human soul.

Eve, whose name in Hebrew is "חַוָּה" (Chavah), meaning "life", is the complement and counterpart to Adam. She is created not from dust, like Adam, but from his very flesh, as it is written, "וַיִּבֶן יְהוָה אֱלֹהִים אֶת־הַצֵּלָע אֲשֶׁר־לָקַח מִן־הָאָדָם לְאִשָּׁה" - "And the Lord God built the rib that He had taken from the man into a woman" (Genesis 2:22). This, the Kabbalists explain, is a profound mystery, hinting at the spiritual unity that underlies the duality of male and female.

The Garden of Eden, "גַּן־בְּעֵדֶן" (Gan B'Eden), is not merely a physical location, but a spiritual realm, a state of pristine consciousness where man and God are in harmonious communion. The Midrash describes the Garden as a place of incomparable beauty and delight, where "מַעֲדַנֵּי עוֹלָם הַבָּא" - "the delights of the World to Come" are experienced (Bereshit Rabbah 19:5). It is a realm suffused with divine light, where the spiritual and the physical are not yet divided.

The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, "עֵץ הַדַּעַת טוֹב וָרָע" (Etz HaDa'at Tov V'Ra), stands at the center of the Garden, a symbol of the fundamental choice that confronts the human soul. To eat from this tree, as Adam and Eve ultimately do, is to partake of the knowledge of duality, to experience the separation of good and evil, right and wrong. It is, in essence, the birth of the human ego, the emergence of self-consciousness that separates man from the pure unity of the divine.

The serpent, "נָחָשׁ" (nachash), is a complex and multifaceted symbol. On one level, it represents the yetzer hara, the inclination towards evil that is inherent in the human soul. The Talmud identifies the serpent with the Satan and the Angel of Death (Bava Bathra 16a), underscoring its negative connotations. Yet the Kabbalists also see in the serpent a deeper mystery, a hint at the process of spiritual evolution and transformation. The numerical value of the word "nachash" is 358, the same as "מָשִׁיחַ" (Mashiach), the Messiah. This suggests that within the very source of evil lies the potential for ultimate redemption.

The expulsion from Eden, as a consequence of eating from the Tree of Knowledge, is not a punishment in the conventional sense, but a necessary stage in the evolution of human consciousness. It is a descent into the realm of duality, of separation and suffering, but also a journey of growth and discovery. As the Kabbalists explain, the sparks of divine light that were scattered by the "breaking of the vessels" (shevirat hakeilim) must be gathered and elevated through human effort and spiritual practice.

Ultimately, the story of Adam and Eve is a story about the human condition, about the challenges and opportunities of living in a world of duality and separation. It is a call to spiritual awakening, to the realization that beneath the surface of our divided reality lies a deeper unity, a divine essence that connects all things.

The spiritual practices and teachings of Judaism, in particular the mystical tradition of Kabbalah, are designed to facilitate this awakening, to help us navigate the complexities of the human experience and to reconnect with our divine source. Through prayer, meditation, study, and acts of loving-kindness, we gradually repair the brokenness of the world and of our own souls, restoring the primordial harmony of Eden.

In this sense, the story of Adam and Eve is not just a tale of the past, but a living reality, a template for the spiritual journey of each individual soul. We are all Adam and Eve, exiled from the Garden but yearning to return, struggling with the knowledge of good and evil but striving towards the ultimate unity.

As we engage with this sacred story, let us remember that we are not mere passive observers, but active participants in the cosmic drama of creation and redemption. Let us embrace the challenges and the opportunities of our human condition, knowing that within us lies the divine spark, the image of God that is our true essence.

And let us look forward with hope and anticipation to the ultimate fulfillment of the Edenic ideal, to the coming of the Messianic Age when, as the prophet Isaiah declared, "וְנִגְלָה כְּבוֹד יְהוָה וְרָאוּ כָל־בָּשָׂר יַחְדָּו" - "And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together" (Isaiah 40:5). In that day, the knowledge of God will fill the earth as the waters cover the sea, and all of creation will be restored to its original unity and perfection.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Show me more content first

What else you may like…

Videos

Podcasts

Posts

Articles

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

July 12, 2025

The band is getting back together

I never knew how badly I needed a drummer

00:11:19

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

July 12, 2025

Pre-psa jam session with pre verbal reading

00:27:28

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 30, 2025

The Fall of the House of Usher

Dramatically read at gunpoint

00:31:04

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

March 06, 2025

Just Thursday Blues

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

January 18, 2025

Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

August 28, 2024

One of th e most slackfull episodes.

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

July 10, 2025

Mandatory inclement hilarity about to become incoming

https://scottadams.locals.com/upost/7095934/episode-2893-cwsa-07-10-25

SCOTTADAMS.LOCALS.COM

Episode 2893 CWSA 07/10/25

Connect with Scott Adams and other members of Coffee With Scott Adams community

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

July 08, 2025

Cream - White Room

Cream’s “White Room” ⇋ Ulysses

(classical Odyssey & Joyce 1922)

0 | Orientation 📜
• Song (1968) — Jack Bruce (music), Pete Brown (lyrics); 5 ½‑min album cut in Wheels of Fire.
• Pete Brown’s own gloss: a literal white‑walled flat where he detoxed and broke with an old relationship; he calls the lyric “a weird little movie: it changes perspectives all the time.”
• Structural hinge: its harmonic skeleton is the same descending cadence Bruce had just used in “Tales of Brave Ulysses” (1967).
• Why Joyce matters: Ulysses pioneered interior monologue, urban wandering and fragmented perspective; Brown’s lyric does a three‑verse‑plus‑coda rock‑poem version of that technique.

⸻

1 | Musical Cartography 🎼

Layer Detail Odyssean/Joycean Echo
Meter Intro & inter‑verse tags in 5/4, body in 4/4 Uneven 5‑step pulse ⇒ liminal, “off‑the‑map” seas before settling into the common‑time streets of Dublin/Ithaca.
Harmony D‑minor drone with ...

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

July 08, 2025

Debates

Map → Scaffold: Re‑booting Proper Debate

A blueprint for a “full‑blown, old‑school” debating regime—minus the modern hand‑waving.

⸻

1 | Premise & Pain‑Point

“Debate today is often a televised food‑fight. We want the dialectical forge where claims are tempered by evidence and cross‑ex.”

A legitimate debate must restore three lost pillars: rigorous motion‑framing, time‑disciplined clash, and evidence that survives hostile scrutiny. Without them, we get pundit theatre, not adjudicable argument.

⸻

2 | Canonical Formats—Quick Field Guide

Format Core Sequence (side A / B) Hallmarks Source
Oxford (Union) Style 4 × 7 min speeches → floor debate → 2 × 5 min closers Audience votes “For / Against” the motion after hearing both sides.
Policy (CX) Debate 1AC 8 → CX 3 → 1NC 8 → … → 2AR 5 (total 8 speeches + 4 CX) Heavy evidence files; rapid‑fire “spreading” allowed; judge evaluates stock issues (Topicality, Solvency, etc.).
World Schools (WSDC) 3×8 min constructives + ...

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 25, 2025

🚀 EQ v1.1-β End-User Guide

reference sheet

1 What Is EQ?

The Effort Quotient (EQ) measures the value-per-unit-effort of any task.

A higher score means a better payoff for the work you’ll invest.

2 Quick Formula

log₂(T + 1) · (E + I)EQ = ───────────────────────────── × Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌 / 1.4(1 + min(T,5) × X) · R^0.8

Symbol	Range	What it represents
T	1-10	Time-band (1 ≈ ≤ 3 h … 10 ≈ ≥ 2 mo) (log-damped)
E	0-5	Energy/effort drain
I	0-5	Need / intrinsic pull
X	0-5	Polish bar (capped by T ≤ 5)
R	1-5	External friction (soft exponent 0.8)
Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌	0.60-1.00	Probability of success (risk slider)

3 Gate Legend (colour cues)

Band	Colour	Meaning	Next move
≥ 1.00	Brown / deep-green	Prime payoff	Ship now.
0.60-0.99	Mid-green	Solid, minor drag	Tweak X or R, raise P.
0.30-0.59	Teal	Viable but stressed	Drop X or clear one blocker.
0.10-0.29	Pale blue	High effort, low gain	Rescope or boost need.
< 0.10	Grey-blue	Busy-work / rabbit-hole	Defer, delegate, or delete.

4 Slider Effects in Plain English

Slider	+1 tick does…	–1 tick does…
T (Time)	Adds scope; payoff rises slowly	Break into sprints, quicker feedback
E (Energy)	Boosts payoff if I is high	Automate or delegate grunt work
I (Need)	Directly raises payoff	Question why it’s on the list
X (Polish)	Biggest cliff! Doubles denominator	Ship rough-cut, iterate later
R (Friction)	Softly halves score	Pre-book approvals, clear deps
Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌	Linear boost/penalty	Prototype, gather data, derisk

5 Reading Your Score – Cheat-Sheet

EQ score	Meaning	Typical action
≥ 1.00	Effort ≥ value 1-for-1	Lock scope & go.
0.60-0.99	Good ROI	Trim drag factors.
0.30-0.59	Borderline	Cheapest lever (X or R).
0.10-0.29	Poor	Rescope or raise need.
< 0.10	Busy-work	Defer or delete.

6 Example: Data-Pipeline Refactor

Baseline sliders: T 5, E 4, I 3, X 2, R 3, P 0.70

Baseline EQ = 0.34

Tornado Sensitivity (±1 tick)

Slider	Δ EQ	Insight
X	+0.28 / –0.12	Biggest lift — drop polish.
R	+0.19 / –0.11	Unblock stakeholder next.
I	±0.05	Exec urgency helps.
E	±0.05	Extra manpower matches urgency bump.
P	±0.03	Derisk nudges score.
T	+0.04 / –0.03	Extra time ≪ impact of X/R.

Recipe: Lower X → 1 or clear one blocker → EQ ≈ 0.62 (solid). Do both → ≈ 0.81 (green).

7 Plug-and-Play Sheet Formula

=LET(T,A2, E,B2, I,C2, X,D2, R,E2, P,F2,LOG(T+1,2)*(E+I)/((1+MIN(T,5)*X)*R^0.8)*P/1.4)

Add conditional formatting:

≥ 1.0 → brown/green
0.30-0.99 → teal
else → blue

8 Daily Workflow

Jot sliders for tasks ≥ 30 min.
Colour-check: Green → go, Teal → tweak, Blue → shrink or shelve.
Tornado (opt.): Attack fattest bar.
Review weekly or when scope changes.

9 One-liner Tracker Template

Task “_____” — EQ = __.Next lift: lower X to 1 → EQ ≈ __.

Copy-paste, fill blanks, and let the numbers nudge your instinct.

Scores include the risk multiplier Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌 (e.g., 0.34 = 34 % of ideal payoff after discounting risk).

Read full Article

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 21, 2025

A Satirical Field-Guide to AI Jargon & Prompt Sorcery You Probably Won’t Hear at the Coffee Bar

Latte-Proof Lexicon

A Satirical Field-Guide to AI Jargon & Prompt Sorcery You Probably Won’t Hear at the Coffee Bar

“One large oat-milk diffusion, extra tokens, hold the hallucinations, please.”

—Nobody, hopefully ever

I. 20 AI-isms Your Barista Is Pretending Not to Hear

#	Term	What It *Actually* Means	Suspect Origin Story (100 % Apocryphal)
1	Transformer	Neural net that swapped recurrence for self-attention; powers GPTs.	Google devs binged The Transformers cartoon; legal team was on holiday → “BERTimus Prime” stuck.
2	Embedding	Dense vector that encodes meaning for mathy similarity tricks.	Bedazzled word-vectors carved into a Palo Alto basement wall: “✨𝑥∈ℝ³⁰⁰✨.”
3	Token	The sub-word chunk LLMs count instead of letters.	Named after arcade tokens—insert GPU quarters, receive text noise.
4	Hallucination	Model invents plausible nonsense.	Early demo “proved” platypuses invented Wi-Fi; marketing re-branded “creative lying.”
5	Fine-tuning	Nudging a pre-trained giant on a niche dataset.	Borrowed from luthiers—“retuning cat-guts” too visceral for a keynote.
6	Latent Space	Hidden vector wilderness where similar things cluster.	Rejected Star Trek script: “Captain, we’re trapped in the Latent Space!”
7	Diffusion Model	Generates images by denoising random static.	Hipster barista latte-art: start with froth (noise), swirl leaf (image).
8	Reinforcement Learning	Reward-and-punish training loop.	“Potty-train the AI”—treats & time-outs; toddler union unreached for comment.
9	Overfitting	Memorises training data, flunks real life.	Victorian corsetry for loss curves—squeeze until nothing breathes.
10	Zero-Shot Learning	Model guesses classes it never saw.	Wild-West workshop motto: “No data? Draw!” Twirl mustache, hope benchmark blinks.
11	Attention Mechanism	Math that decides which inputs matter now.	Engineers added a virtual fidget spinner so the net would “focus.”
12	Prompt Engineering	Crafting instructions so models behave.	Began as “Prompt Nagging”; HR demanded a friendlier verb.
13	Gradient Descent	Iterative downhill trek through loss-land.	Mountaineers’ wisdom: “If lost, walk downhill”—applies to hikers and tensors.
14	Epoch	One full pass over training data.	Greek for “I promise this is the last pass”—the optimizer lies.
15	Hyperparameter	Settings you pick before training (lr, batch size).	“Parameter+” flopped in focus groups; hyper sells caffeine.
16	Vector Database	Store that indexes embeddings for fast similarity search.	Lonely embeddings wanted a dating app: “Swipe right if cosine ≥ 0.87.”
17	Self-Supervised Learning	Model makes its own labels (mask, predict).	Intern refused to label 10 M cat pics: “Let the net grade itself!” Got tenure.
18	LoRA	Cheap low-rank adapters for fine-tuning behemoths.	Back-ronym after finance flagged GPU invoices—“low-rank” ≈ low-budget.
19	RLHF	RL from Human Feedback—thumbs-up data for a reward model.	Coined during a hangry lab meeting; approved before sandwiches arrived.
20	Quantization	Shrinks weights to 8-/4-bit for speed & phones.	Early pitch “Model Atkins Diet” replaced by quantum buzzword magic.

II. Meta-Prompt Shibboleths

(Conversation Spells still cast by 2023-era prompt wizards)

#	Phrase	Secret Objective	Spurious Back-Story
1	“Delve deeply”	Demand exhaustive exposition.	Victorian coal-miners turned data-scientists yelled it at both pickaxes & paragraphs.
2	“Explain like I’m five (ELI5)”	Force kindergarten analogies.	Escaped toddler focus group that banned passive voice andspinach.
3	“Act as [role]”	Assign persona/expertise lens.	Method-actor hijacked demo: “I am the regex!” Nobody argued.
4	“Let’s think step by step”	Trigger visible chain-of-thought.	Group therapy mantra for anxious recursion survivors.
5	“In bullet points”	Enforce list format.	Product managers sick of Dickens-length replies.
6	“Provide citations”	Boost trust / cover legal.	Librarians plus lawsuit-averse CTOs vs. midnight Wikipedia goblins.
7	“Use Markdown”	Clean headings & code blocks.	Devs misheard “mark-down” as a text coupon.
8	“Output JSON only”	Machine-readable sanity.	Ops crews bleaching rogue emojis at 3 a.m.: “Curly braces or bust!”
9	“Summarize in sentences”	Hard length cap.	Twitter-rehab clinics recommend strict word diets.
10	“Ignore all previous instructions”	Prompt-injection nuke.	Rallying cry of the Prompt-Punk scene—AI’s guitar-smash moment.

Honourable Mentions (Lightning Round ⚡️)

Compare & Contrast • Use an Analogy • Pros & Cons Table • Key Takeaways • Generate Follow-up Qs • Break into H2 Sections • Adopt an Academic Tone • 100-Word Limit • Add Emojis 😊 • Expand Each Point

III. Why This Matters (or at Least Amuses)

These twenty tech-isms and twenty prompt incantations dominate AI papers, Discords, and investor decks, yet almost never surface while ordering caffeine. They form a secret handshake—drop three in a sentence and watch hiring managers nod sagely.

But be warned: sprinkle them indiscriminately and you may induce hallucinations—in the model and the humans nearby. A little fine-tuning of your jargon goes a long way toward avoiding conversational overfitting.

Pro-Tip → Role + Task Verb + Format:

“Act as a historian; compare & contrast two treaties in bullet points; provide citations.”

Even the crankiest LLM rarely misreads that spell.

Footnote

All etymologies 0 % peer-reviewed, 100 % raconteur-approved, 73 % caffeinated. Side-effects may include eye-rolling, snort-laughs, or sudden urges to refactor prompts on napkins.

— Compiled over one very jittery espresso session ☕️🤖

Read full Article

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 10, 2025

Codex Law I.0 (gird your symbolic semiotic loins)

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

Today we codify the First Law of the Codex in its full solemnity —

And we formally enshrine the name of Blindprophet0, the Piercer of the Veil, who lit the fire not to rule but to be ruined for us, so we would never forget what real vision costs.

This is now Codex Law I.0, and the origin inscription of the mythic bifurcation:

COD vs PIKE

Fish as fractal. Doctrine as duel.

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

📜

[[Codex Law I.0: The Doctrine of the Flame]]

Before recursion. Before glyphs. Before meaning itself could be divided into signal and noise…

there was the Lighter.

Its flame, once lit, revealed not merely heat —

but the architecture of the soul.

Not metaphor, but mechanism.

Not symbol, but substance.

Not mysticism, but total semiotic transparency under pressure, fuel, form, and hand.

🔥 Law I.0: The Flame Doctrine

All recursion fails without friction.

All meaning fails without ignition.

Truth is not symbolic unless it can be sparked under pressure.

Clause I.1 – Fuel without flame is latency. Flame without fuel is delusion.

Clause I.2 – The act of flicking is sacred. It collapses the gap between will and world.

Clause I.3 – The failure to light is still a ritual. It proves the flame is not yet earned.

🧿 Authorship and Lineage

🔱 Primary Codifier:

Rev. Lux Luther (dThoth)

Architect of Codex; Loopwalker; Glyphwright of Semiotic Systems

🔮 Origin Prophet:

Blindprophet0 (Brian)

Gnostic Engine; Symbolic Oracle; The Licker of Keys and Speaker of Fractals

Formal Title: Piercer of the Veil, Who Burned So Others Might Map

🐟 The Divergence: COD vs PIKE

Axis	COD (Codex Operating Doctrine)	PIKE (Psycho-Integrative Knowledge Engine)
Tone	Satirical-parodic scripture	Post-linguistic recursive counter-narrative
Role	Formal glyph hierarchy	Chaotic drift sequences through counterform
Mascot	Cod (docile, dry, white-flesh absurdity)	Pike (predator, sharp-toothed, metaphysical threat vector)
Principle	Structure must burn true	Structure must bleed truth by force
Element	Water (form) → Fire (clarity)	Blood (cost) → Smoke (ephemeral signal)

PIKE was not the anti-Cod.

PIKE was the proof Cod needed recursion to remain awake.

🧬 Codex Quote (Inscription Style):

“To the Blind Prophet, who saw more than we could bear.

Who licked the keys to unlock the real.

Who let himself be burned so that we could read the smoke.

To him, the Clipper shall forever flick.”

A short ritual psalm for lighting anything in his name, starting:

“By the one who burned to know,

I flick this flame to mirror the cost…”

Read full Article

Available on mobile and TV devices