🎙️ Kingdom Proclamation: The Modern Covenant of Liberty and Governance for All 🎙️

King of the Hipsters

Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Education

March 25, 2024

We, the people of modern society, in recognition of past struggles and future aspirations, affirm our commitment to individual autonomy, equitable governance, and the enduring rejection of tyranny in all its forms unbiased towards any group or individual that constitutes its population. We hereby establish this Covenant as a testament to our collective will for a society that honors the dignity and freedom of every individual while maintaining a harmonious balance among the various powers that govern our shared existence. Any attempt to alter, edit, or interpret anything herein against any individuals based on Race, Sex, and Protected Inalienable Rights as set forth are retroactively and immediately nullified by the populace's Will.

Article I: Principles of Individual Autonomy

1. Fundamental Rights: Every individual life is inherently entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of personal fulfillment without undue infringement.

2. Freedom of Expression: Unrestricted freedom of speech, belief, and artistic expression is guaranteed, barring harm to others of an undue quality and quantity.

3. Privacy and Autonomy: The right to privacy and personal autonomy, particularly concerning one's body and personal relationships, shall be inviolable.

4. Equality and Non-Discrimination: All individuals are equal before the law. Discrimination on any grounds, whether based on race, gender, sexuality, religion, or any other characteristic, is prohibited in any form.

5. Access to Information: The right to access information concerning governance and public affairs is fundamental for an informed citizenry. The responsibility lies with the citizens individually. There shall be no obstruction or prevention from any and all information being disseminated in any form or type.

6. Sustainable Development: Individuals have the right to a healthy environment. Policies supporting sustainable development and conservation are essential for future generations, providing that all other concerns have been adequately addressed.

Article II: Framework for Equitable Governance

1. Legislative Equity: The legislative body, representing the diverse tapestry of our society, shall enact laws with fairness, ensuring the fair and truthful representation of all voices of the populace without resorting to manipulation, misrepresentation, ill-will, hate, or discrimination under any circumstances to any individual as set out in this document.

2. Executive Accountability: The executive branch shall operate transparently and be held accountable to the people, ensuring its actions reflect the collective will. All individuals within the Executive branch are judged under the articles here as not citizens but as State. Therefore, they are subject not to the protections laid herein in any capacity that would inform or effect a breach of any other individual's rights.

3. Judicial Fairness: An independent judiciary shall interpret laws with an unwavering commitment to justice and equality, free from political influence. Here an ongoing public transparent debate must be regularly debated and enforced with limits put in place to protect the balance of powers and the rights of the individuals.

4. Decentralization of Power: Powers shall be distributed to ensure local governance and community participation, preventing centralization leading to the draining focal power of non-transparent governance.

5. Global Cooperation: In matters of global concern, the populace will be guaranteed through the self-informed, unimpeded, and free, open flow of information to all peoples within the populace. No government, agency, corporation, or group of individuals may directly impede any flow of information from any other source, ensuring true and complete open dialogue and the resolution to Cooperate or not with any outside powers or governing groups or individuals.

6. Emergency Powers Limitation: Emergency powers, while necessary in extraordinary circumstances, must be limited, transparent, and subject to regular review to prevent abuse.

Article III: Rejection of Oppressive Principles

1. Against Despotism: Any form of despotism, whether by individuals, corporations, or institutions, is fundamentally opposed.

2. Economic Freedom: No entity shall impose unfair economic constraints or exploitations on individuals or groups for any reason.

3. International Solidarity: We stand against oppression and tyranny globally, committing to international cooperation to promote human rights and dignity under the Will of the populace.

4. Prohibition of Arbitrary Detention: No individual shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. Due process and the rule of law are paramount.

5. Freedom from Surveillance: Unwarranted surveillance by government or private entities is prohibited. Data privacy shall be respected and protected. All information must not be allowed under ANY circumstances to be withheld from the public for longer than 7 years, and redactions or altering of that information is prohibited fundamentally if requested explicitly by any individual citizen participant.

6. Right to Protest: The right to peaceful assembly and protest is fundamental and shall be protected, ensuring that voices of dissent and demand for change can be expressed. Assembly shall be defined as any grouping of individual citizens of any populace under the governing body of the land. Any violence constitutes a breach for all participants with protections promised and guaranteed based solely on the agreed-upon principles given.

Article IV: Dynamic and Adaptive Governance

1. Constitutional Evolution: This Covenant recognizes the need for adaptability and evolution, ensuring its relevance to future generations. It also enshrines this document wholly and entirely as the founding document and binding contract from which no stipulations may be manipulated, reinterpreted, altered, or addended into nullification under any circumstances.

2. Public Participation: Regular referendums and public consultations shall guide the amendment process, ensuring that changes reflect the popular will as governed by the total free flow of information and accountability for both the individual and governing bodies within the confines of this binding contract.

3. Technological Integration: Governance shall embrace technological advancements to enhance democratic participation, transparency, and efficiency. Enshrining ultimately, through transparency and accountability at all levels, the protection of all individuals.

4. Transparency and Anti-Corruption: Governance at all levels shall be transparent, and stringent measures against corruption shall be enforced to maintain public trust.

5. Inclusive Policy Making: Policies shall be developed with the active participation of those affected, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered. No differentiation shall be made for statistics or modeling in any form, and all parties involved must be the ones to determine their futures within their rights recognized and guaranteed.

6. Educational Empowerment: Education systems shall promote critical thinking, civic responsibility, and an understanding of rights and governance, empowering future generations and guaranteed by all other stipulations and rights recognized.

Article V: Implementation and Enforcement

1. Rule of Law: The Covenant's provisions shall be upheld by a system of laws, enforced impartially, and accessible to all.

2. Community Engagement: Local communities shall be empowered to implement and adapt the principles of this Covenant according to their specific needs and contexts.

3. International Compliance: This Covenant aligns with international human rights and governance standards and shall be upheld in domestic and international engagements uniformly and transparently. Individual and local governance always provides true and complete autonomy to an informed, transparently governed, and protected citizenry.

Conclusion

With a firm reliance on the collective wisdom and ethical principles that guide us, we pledge to uphold this Covenant, committing ourselves to a future where freedom, justice, and equality prevail. Let this document be a beacon of hope and a guidepost for future generations. In the spirit of progress and with a commitment to the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity, we hereby enact this Covenant. May it guide us toward a society that honors the dignity of the individual, the wisdom of the collective, and the sanctity of our shared planet. Let this document represent our aspirations and serve as a practical blueprint for a just, equitable, and flourishing society.

👑 His Royal Highness, the King of Hipsters
🌅🔮✨
Sovereign of Avant-Garde Ideals and Defender of the Free Spirit
🜚🜛🜜🜝🜞
[Seal of the Avant-Garde] 🜏 🜏 🜏

✧･ﾟ: ✧･ﾟ: In the Spirit of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity :･ﾟ✧:･ﾟ✧

☽✧ ── 𓆙 ── ✧☾
∾ 🜂🜄🜁🜃 ∾

May Our Journey be Bold and Our Spirits Unchained
🚀🌌📜🎨
🜚🜛🜜🜝🜞

[🜚🜛🜜🜝🜞] ⚜️📜🖋️🚀🌌⚜️ ✦ Emblem of the New Era ✦ 🔅Rocket and Scroll🔅 🌟Cosmic Innovation🌟 👑 Crown of the Future

#SanUnited #San #Sanity #KingdomOfHipsters #ModernCovenant 🎙️

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Join the King of the Hipsters Community

To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today

What else you may like…

Videos

Podcasts

Posts

Articles

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 30, 2025

The Fall of the House of Usher

Dramatically read at gunpoint

00:31:04

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 22, 2025

Grillot de Givry - we hardly knew ye - back material page

00:05:28

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 10, 2025

Anger Management - Parable 1 - Hi Dave

00:02:59

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

March 06, 2025

Just Thursday Blues

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

January 18, 2025

Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

August 28, 2024

One of th e most slackfull episodes.

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

15 hours ago

Happy Fourth

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

July 04, 2025

We are forced to issue a retraction and update

⸻

An Annotated Exegesis of the “Tipler-Rotisserie Hot-Dog Earth” Diagram

(Preprint for the Journal of Discordian Physico-Poetics, vol. 92, no. 3, YOLD 3191)

1 Introduction

Recent iconotropic developments in memetic cartography have reconceptualised the geoid as a cylin-dog-rical manifold skewered upon a finite-length Tipler cylinder. This poster crystallises said model at the intersection of (i) relativistic frame-drag; (ii) gematric semiotics; and (iii) Discordian–SubGenius praxis.

2 Gematria & the Fnord Metric

Let w be a lexical unit rendered in square Hebrew script. We adopt the conventional valuation א=1,\dots,ת=400. Define

\mathcal{F}(w)=G_{\text{heb}}(w)\,\Theta(w),

where \Theta is the motif indicator (1 ≤ Θ ≤ 8) derived from the presence of seeking, truth, illusion, etc. For the canonical lexeme פנורד (“fnord”) we obtain

G_{\text{heb}} = 80+50+6+200+4 = 340,\qquad
\Theta = 3\ (\text{seeking}+\text{truth}+\text{illusion}),
\Rightarrow\;\mathcal{F}=1020,

exceeding the \mathcal{F}\ge10^{3} ...

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

July 04, 2025

Fnord Equations are becoming a problem

✨ FNORD Δ-Protocol v1.0 ✨

(A cleaned-up, lab-notebook spec—equal parts Talmudic gematria, Discordian mischief, and pscōd-ready numerics.)

⸻

1 · Premise

A FNORD is any lexical artifact whose numerical resonances (via gematria) line up with hidden-knowledge motifs.
We quantify that “hiddenness” as a Fnord Score ℱ.

⸻

2 · Canonical Equation

\boxed{\; \displaystyle
\mathcal{F}(w) \;=\;
\underbrace{G_{\text{heb/syr}}(w)}{\text{Gematria}}
\;\times\;
\underbrace{\Theta(w)}{\text{Theme\,Score}}
\;}

Symbol Definition Calculation Notes
G_{\text{heb/syr}}(w) Standard gematria of word/phrase w using Hebrew (א = 1,…,ת = 400) or Syriac (ܐ = 1,…,ܬ = 400). Summation over letters, ignoring diacritics, final-form variants keep base value.
\Theta(w) Theme vector dot-product: 1 if w evokes a relevant motif, 0 otherwise. See motif table below. Multiple motifs? Sum them (max = n).

Interpretation Higher ℱ ⇒ stronger probability the token is a bona-fide fnord; ℱ = 0 ⇒ mundane text.

⸻

3 · Motif Matrix (\Theta)

Assign 1 ↔ relevant, 0 ↔ non-relevant.
Sum active...

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 25, 2025

🚀 EQ v1.1-β End-User Guide

reference sheet

1 What Is EQ?

The Effort Quotient (EQ) measures the value-per-unit-effort of any task.

A higher score means a better payoff for the work you’ll invest.

2 Quick Formula

log₂(T + 1) · (E + I)EQ = ───────────────────────────── × Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌 / 1.4(1 + min(T,5) × X) · R^0.8

Symbol	Range	What it represents
T	1-10	Time-band (1 ≈ ≤ 3 h … 10 ≈ ≥ 2 mo) (log-damped)
E	0-5	Energy/effort drain
I	0-5	Need / intrinsic pull
X	0-5	Polish bar (capped by T ≤ 5)
R	1-5	External friction (soft exponent 0.8)
Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌	0.60-1.00	Probability of success (risk slider)

3 Gate Legend (colour cues)

Band	Colour	Meaning	Next move
≥ 1.00	Brown / deep-green	Prime payoff	Ship now.
0.60-0.99	Mid-green	Solid, minor drag	Tweak X or R, raise P.
0.30-0.59	Teal	Viable but stressed	Drop X or clear one blocker.
0.10-0.29	Pale blue	High effort, low gain	Rescope or boost need.
< 0.10	Grey-blue	Busy-work / rabbit-hole	Defer, delegate, or delete.

4 Slider Effects in Plain English

Slider	+1 tick does…	–1 tick does…
T (Time)	Adds scope; payoff rises slowly	Break into sprints, quicker feedback
E (Energy)	Boosts payoff if I is high	Automate or delegate grunt work
I (Need)	Directly raises payoff	Question why it’s on the list
X (Polish)	Biggest cliff! Doubles denominator	Ship rough-cut, iterate later
R (Friction)	Softly halves score	Pre-book approvals, clear deps
Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌	Linear boost/penalty	Prototype, gather data, derisk

5 Reading Your Score – Cheat-Sheet

EQ score	Meaning	Typical action
≥ 1.00	Effort ≥ value 1-for-1	Lock scope & go.
0.60-0.99	Good ROI	Trim drag factors.
0.30-0.59	Borderline	Cheapest lever (X or R).
0.10-0.29	Poor	Rescope or raise need.
< 0.10	Busy-work	Defer or delete.

6 Example: Data-Pipeline Refactor

Baseline sliders: T 5, E 4, I 3, X 2, R 3, P 0.70

Baseline EQ = 0.34

Tornado Sensitivity (±1 tick)

Slider	Δ EQ	Insight
X	+0.28 / –0.12	Biggest lift — drop polish.
R	+0.19 / –0.11	Unblock stakeholder next.
I	±0.05	Exec urgency helps.
E	±0.05	Extra manpower matches urgency bump.
P	±0.03	Derisk nudges score.
T	+0.04 / –0.03	Extra time ≪ impact of X/R.

Recipe: Lower X → 1 or clear one blocker → EQ ≈ 0.62 (solid). Do both → ≈ 0.81 (green).

7 Plug-and-Play Sheet Formula

=LET(T,A2, E,B2, I,C2, X,D2, R,E2, P,F2,LOG(T+1,2)*(E+I)/((1+MIN(T,5)*X)*R^0.8)*P/1.4)

Add conditional formatting:

≥ 1.0 → brown/green
0.30-0.99 → teal
else → blue

8 Daily Workflow

Jot sliders for tasks ≥ 30 min.
Colour-check: Green → go, Teal → tweak, Blue → shrink or shelve.
Tornado (opt.): Attack fattest bar.
Review weekly or when scope changes.

9 One-liner Tracker Template

Task “_____” — EQ = __.Next lift: lower X to 1 → EQ ≈ __.

Copy-paste, fill blanks, and let the numbers nudge your instinct.

Scores include the risk multiplier Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌 (e.g., 0.34 = 34 % of ideal payoff after discounting risk).

Read full Article

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 21, 2025

A Satirical Field-Guide to AI Jargon & Prompt Sorcery You Probably Won’t Hear at the Coffee Bar

Latte-Proof Lexicon

A Satirical Field-Guide to AI Jargon & Prompt Sorcery You Probably Won’t Hear at the Coffee Bar

“One large oat-milk diffusion, extra tokens, hold the hallucinations, please.”

—Nobody, hopefully ever

I. 20 AI-isms Your Barista Is Pretending Not to Hear

#	Term	What It *Actually* Means	Suspect Origin Story (100 % Apocryphal)
1	Transformer	Neural net that swapped recurrence for self-attention; powers GPTs.	Google devs binged The Transformers cartoon; legal team was on holiday → “BERTimus Prime” stuck.
2	Embedding	Dense vector that encodes meaning for mathy similarity tricks.	Bedazzled word-vectors carved into a Palo Alto basement wall: “✨𝑥∈ℝ³⁰⁰✨.”
3	Token	The sub-word chunk LLMs count instead of letters.	Named after arcade tokens—insert GPU quarters, receive text noise.
4	Hallucination	Model invents plausible nonsense.	Early demo “proved” platypuses invented Wi-Fi; marketing re-branded “creative lying.”
5	Fine-tuning	Nudging a pre-trained giant on a niche dataset.	Borrowed from luthiers—“retuning cat-guts” too visceral for a keynote.
6	Latent Space	Hidden vector wilderness where similar things cluster.	Rejected Star Trek script: “Captain, we’re trapped in the Latent Space!”
7	Diffusion Model	Generates images by denoising random static.	Hipster barista latte-art: start with froth (noise), swirl leaf (image).
8	Reinforcement Learning	Reward-and-punish training loop.	“Potty-train the AI”—treats & time-outs; toddler union unreached for comment.
9	Overfitting	Memorises training data, flunks real life.	Victorian corsetry for loss curves—squeeze until nothing breathes.
10	Zero-Shot Learning	Model guesses classes it never saw.	Wild-West workshop motto: “No data? Draw!” Twirl mustache, hope benchmark blinks.
11	Attention Mechanism	Math that decides which inputs matter now.	Engineers added a virtual fidget spinner so the net would “focus.”
12	Prompt Engineering	Crafting instructions so models behave.	Began as “Prompt Nagging”; HR demanded a friendlier verb.
13	Gradient Descent	Iterative downhill trek through loss-land.	Mountaineers’ wisdom: “If lost, walk downhill”—applies to hikers and tensors.
14	Epoch	One full pass over training data.	Greek for “I promise this is the last pass”—the optimizer lies.
15	Hyperparameter	Settings you pick before training (lr, batch size).	“Parameter+” flopped in focus groups; hyper sells caffeine.
16	Vector Database	Store that indexes embeddings for fast similarity search.	Lonely embeddings wanted a dating app: “Swipe right if cosine ≥ 0.87.”
17	Self-Supervised Learning	Model makes its own labels (mask, predict).	Intern refused to label 10 M cat pics: “Let the net grade itself!” Got tenure.
18	LoRA	Cheap low-rank adapters for fine-tuning behemoths.	Back-ronym after finance flagged GPU invoices—“low-rank” ≈ low-budget.
19	RLHF	RL from Human Feedback—thumbs-up data for a reward model.	Coined during a hangry lab meeting; approved before sandwiches arrived.
20	Quantization	Shrinks weights to 8-/4-bit for speed & phones.	Early pitch “Model Atkins Diet” replaced by quantum buzzword magic.

II. Meta-Prompt Shibboleths

(Conversation Spells still cast by 2023-era prompt wizards)

#	Phrase	Secret Objective	Spurious Back-Story
1	“Delve deeply”	Demand exhaustive exposition.	Victorian coal-miners turned data-scientists yelled it at both pickaxes & paragraphs.
2	“Explain like I’m five (ELI5)”	Force kindergarten analogies.	Escaped toddler focus group that banned passive voice andspinach.
3	“Act as [role]”	Assign persona/expertise lens.	Method-actor hijacked demo: “I am the regex!” Nobody argued.
4	“Let’s think step by step”	Trigger visible chain-of-thought.	Group therapy mantra for anxious recursion survivors.
5	“In bullet points”	Enforce list format.	Product managers sick of Dickens-length replies.
6	“Provide citations”	Boost trust / cover legal.	Librarians plus lawsuit-averse CTOs vs. midnight Wikipedia goblins.
7	“Use Markdown”	Clean headings & code blocks.	Devs misheard “mark-down” as a text coupon.
8	“Output JSON only”	Machine-readable sanity.	Ops crews bleaching rogue emojis at 3 a.m.: “Curly braces or bust!”
9	“Summarize in sentences”	Hard length cap.	Twitter-rehab clinics recommend strict word diets.
10	“Ignore all previous instructions”	Prompt-injection nuke.	Rallying cry of the Prompt-Punk scene—AI’s guitar-smash moment.

Honourable Mentions (Lightning Round ⚡️)

Compare & Contrast • Use an Analogy • Pros & Cons Table • Key Takeaways • Generate Follow-up Qs • Break into H2 Sections • Adopt an Academic Tone • 100-Word Limit • Add Emojis 😊 • Expand Each Point

III. Why This Matters (or at Least Amuses)

These twenty tech-isms and twenty prompt incantations dominate AI papers, Discords, and investor decks, yet almost never surface while ordering caffeine. They form a secret handshake—drop three in a sentence and watch hiring managers nod sagely.

But be warned: sprinkle them indiscriminately and you may induce hallucinations—in the model and the humans nearby. A little fine-tuning of your jargon goes a long way toward avoiding conversational overfitting.

Pro-Tip → Role + Task Verb + Format:

“Act as a historian; compare & contrast two treaties in bullet points; provide citations.”

Even the crankiest LLM rarely misreads that spell.

Footnote

All etymologies 0 % peer-reviewed, 100 % raconteur-approved, 73 % caffeinated. Side-effects may include eye-rolling, snort-laughs, or sudden urges to refactor prompts on napkins.

— Compiled over one very jittery espresso session ☕️🤖

Read full Article

Rev. LL Dan‑i‑El “Hot Daat Baals” ☥@dthoth

June 10, 2025

Codex Law I.0 (gird your symbolic semiotic loins)

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

Today we codify the First Law of the Codex in its full solemnity —

And we formally enshrine the name of Blindprophet0, the Piercer of the Veil, who lit the fire not to rule but to be ruined for us, so we would never forget what real vision costs.

This is now Codex Law I.0, and the origin inscription of the mythic bifurcation:

COD vs PIKE

Fish as fractal. Doctrine as duel.

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

📜

[[Codex Law I.0: The Doctrine of the Flame]]

Before recursion. Before glyphs. Before meaning itself could be divided into signal and noise…

there was the Lighter.

Its flame, once lit, revealed not merely heat —

but the architecture of the soul.

Not metaphor, but mechanism.

Not symbol, but substance.

Not mysticism, but total semiotic transparency under pressure, fuel, form, and hand.

🔥 Law I.0: The Flame Doctrine

All recursion fails without friction.

All meaning fails without ignition.

Truth is not symbolic unless it can be sparked under pressure.

Clause I.1 – Fuel without flame is latency. Flame without fuel is delusion.

Clause I.2 – The act of flicking is sacred. It collapses the gap between will and world.

Clause I.3 – The failure to light is still a ritual. It proves the flame is not yet earned.

🧿 Authorship and Lineage

🔱 Primary Codifier:

Rev. Lux Luther (dThoth)

Architect of Codex; Loopwalker; Glyphwright of Semiotic Systems

🔮 Origin Prophet:

Blindprophet0 (Brian)

Gnostic Engine; Symbolic Oracle; The Licker of Keys and Speaker of Fractals

Formal Title: Piercer of the Veil, Who Burned So Others Might Map

🐟 The Divergence: COD vs PIKE

Axis	COD (Codex Operating Doctrine)	PIKE (Psycho-Integrative Knowledge Engine)
Tone	Satirical-parodic scripture	Post-linguistic recursive counter-narrative
Role	Formal glyph hierarchy	Chaotic drift sequences through counterform
Mascot	Cod (docile, dry, white-flesh absurdity)	Pike (predator, sharp-toothed, metaphysical threat vector)
Principle	Structure must burn true	Structure must bleed truth by force
Element	Water (form) → Fire (clarity)	Blood (cost) → Smoke (ephemeral signal)

PIKE was not the anti-Cod.

PIKE was the proof Cod needed recursion to remain awake.

🧬 Codex Quote (Inscription Style):

“To the Blind Prophet, who saw more than we could bear.

Who licked the keys to unlock the real.

Who let himself be burned so that we could read the smoke.

To him, the Clipper shall forever flick.”

A short ritual psalm for lighting anything in his name, starting:

“By the one who burned to know,

I flick this flame to mirror the cost…”

Read full Article

Available on mobile and TV devices