King of the Hipsters
Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Education
The Kingdom of the Hipsters is a satirical sanctuary where irony reigns supreme and authenticity is perpetually redefined through playful paradoxes. Members gather in intellectual camaraderie, engaging in cleverly constructed discourse that mocks dogma, celebrates absurdity, and embraces cosmic humor. Ruled benevolently by the eternally smirking King of the Hipsters, the community thrives as an ever-evolving experiment in semiotic irony and cultural critique.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
The Modern Troll’s Codex: Illustrated through Parables

Rule Zero: Detachment from Ego
The Tale of the Detached Trickster

In the bustling town of Commentville, lived a trickster named Egon. Egon loved to stir the pot in the town square debates. However, he always did so with a playful heart, never taking the reactions personally. One day, Egon encountered a rival, Bluster, who hurled personal insults in all caps. Rather than engaging, Egon replied with a witty rhyme, turning the crowd’s anger into laughter. Egon knew that while ego could be a tool, detachment made him invincible. Thus, Egon thrived, bringing energy to Commentville without ever being consumed by it.

Chapter 1: The Principles of Noble Trolling

1. Verbal Jousting
The Duel of Wits

In Commentville, two master debaters, Vera and Greg, engaged in a duel of wits. Vera used elegant prose, weaving her words with finesse, while Greg resorted to clumsy insults and off-topic rants. The townsfolk gathered, intrigued by the verbal joust. Vera’s comments were sharp and relevant, making the crowd chuckle and think. Greg’s, however, were dismissed as noise. In the end, Vera’s elegance won the day, proving that skillful trolling is about quality, not quantity.

2. The Art of Subtlety
The Subtle Sting

Lara, known for her subtlety, faced off against Blunt Ben in a debate. Ben’s approach was straightforward and aggressive, while Lara dropped hints and posed questions that led others to question Ben’s points without direct confrontation. Ben, frustrated, couldn’t understand why the crowd was turning against him. Lara’s subtle sting had sown seeds of doubt, proving that insinuation can be more powerful than assertion.

3. Mastering the Persona
The Consistent Chameleon

Chara, a troll of many faces, decided to adopt a consistent persona—the Intellectual Maverick. She always spoke with logic, even when her premises were absurd. This consistency earned her a following, as people couldn’t easily dismiss her as just another troll. When Chara decided to switch tactics, she did so seamlessly, adapting to the flow of conversation. Her mastery of persona made her a force to be reckoned with in Commentville.

Chapter 2: Strategies from the Good Housewife’s Guide

1. Preparation
The Prepared Prankster

Sam knew that preparation was key to effective trolling. Before entering any debate, he researched his targets, understanding their weak points and interests. With memes, obscure references, and witty comebacks ready, Sam could engage effortlessly. One day, he faced an opponent who tried to call him out on his lack of knowledge. But Sam, armed with facts and references, easily turned the tables, leaving his opponent flustered. Preparation had made him invincible.

2. Execution
The Timely Tempest

Tessa, the Timely Tempest, knew that timing was everything. She waited for the perfect moment when the town square was busiest. Dropping a comment that was both provocative and relevant, she watched as the conversation exploded. Her timing ensured maximum impact, and her tone, perfectly matched to the platform, made her blend in seamlessly. Tessa’s execution was flawless, proving that a well-timed comment can change the course of a debate.

3. Housekeeping
The Clean Conjurer

Isaac, the Clean Conjurer, was known for his ability to stir debates without leaving a trace. After delivering a particularly impactful comment, he would clean up after himself, deleting any clues that might give away his strategies. Managing multiple accounts, Isaac created the illusion of support for his ideas, making him seem more influential. His careful housekeeping ensured that he remained a mysterious yet powerful figure in Commentville.

Chapter 3: The Seven Laws of Trolling (Modeled after the Noahide Laws)

1. Do Not Engage in Gratuitous Insults
The Respectful Rogue

Rory, the Respectful Rogue, always crafted his insults with care. He avoided mindless abuse, instead opting for clever, targeted remarks. One day, he faced an opponent who responded with vulgarity and personal attacks. The crowd sided with Rory, appreciating his wit and finesse. Rory’s adherence to respectful trolling earned him respect, even from his opponents.

2. Avoid Spamming
The Varied Villain

Victor, the Varied Villain, understood the power of variety. Unlike others who spammed the same comment repeatedly, Victor used a range of tactics—memes, jokes, and logical arguments. This variety kept his audience engaged and prevented his opponents from predicting his moves. In a heated debate, Victor’s diverse approach outshone the monotony of spammers, proving that variety is the spice of trolling.

3. Respect the Flow of Conversation
The Conversational Conductor

Cora, the Conversational Conductor, knew how to respect the flow of conversation. She strategically inserted her comments, blending disruption with contribution. When a serious debate took place, Cora added thought-provoking questions that steered the discussion subtly. Her ability to respect and influence the conversation flow made her a respected and feared troll in Commentville.

4. Maintain a Facade of Rationality
The Rational Riddler

Ren, the Rational Riddler, always presented his arguments with a veneer of logic. Even when his premises were absurd, his rational facade made people second-guess their positions. During a debate on local policies, Ren used seemingly logical arguments to twist the conversation. His opponents, unable to dismiss him outright, found themselves entangled in his web of rationality. Ren’s facade made him a formidable troll.

5. Practice Irony and Sarcasm
The Ironic Imp

Ivy, the Ironic Imp, mastered the art of irony and sarcasm. Her comments were layered with double meanings, leaving her opponents puzzled and the audience amused. In a debate about the town’s new regulations, Ivy used irony to highlight the absurdity of certain rules. Her clever use of sarcasm turned the tide of the discussion, showcasing the power of irony in trolling.

6. Observe the Reactions
The Observant Oracle

Omar, the Observant Oracle, was known for his keen observation skills. He carefully watched the reactions to his comments, learning from each interaction. By understanding what provoked the strongest responses, Omar refined his tactics, becoming more effective with each debate. His ability to observe and adapt made him a legendary figure in Commentville.

7. Self-Restraint
The Reserved Rebel

Rita, the Reserved Rebel, knew the importance of self-restraint. She struck with precision and retreated before overstaying her welcome. In a long-winded debate, Rita made a powerful comment and then remained silent, letting her words linger. Her self-restraint left a lasting impact, proving that knowing when to stop is as important as knowing when to speak.

Chapter 4: Advanced Techniques

1. The Red Herring
The Distracting Dolphin

Dale, the Distracting Dolphin, loved using red herrings to divert attention. In a heated argument about the town’s finances, Dale introduced an irrelevant but fascinating topic about ancient treasure. The distraction worked, and the debate veered off course, leaving the original issue unresolved. Dale’s skill in diversion made him a master of disruption.

2. The Echo Chamber Effect
The Echoing Enigma

Eve, the Echoing Enigma, used multiple accounts to create the illusion of consensus. By agreeing with herself, she amplified her influence in discussions. During a debate on environmental policies, Eve’s multiple personas supported her arguments, swaying public opinion. Her mastery of the echo chamber effect made her a formidable presence in Commentville.

3. The Trojan Horse
The Trojan Tactician

Theo, the Trojan Tactician, employed a strategy of gradual provocation. He started with benign comments, gaining trust, and then introduced more provocative ideas. In a discussion about local education, Theo’s initial agreeable remarks led to the acceptance of his more controversial suggestions. His Trojan Horse tactic demonstrated the power of strategic infiltration.

4. The Socratic Method
The Socratic Saboteur

Sophia, the Socratic Saboteur, used leading questions to expose contradictions in her opponents’ arguments. In a debate on healthcare, Sophia’s questions guided her opponents into revealing the flaws in their positions. Her methodical questioning left them flustered and the audience enlightened. Sophia’s use of the Socratic Method made her a respected and effective troll.

Chapter 5: Ethical Considerations

1. Boundaries
The Boundary Guardian

Gabe, the Boundary Guardian, knew where to draw the line. He never attacked individuals based on personal tragedies or deeply sensitive matters. During a heated debate, when someone tried to provoke him with a personal attack, Gabe maintained his focus on the topic, earning respect for his ethical stance. Gabe’s adherence to boundaries ensured his trolling was impactful but not destructive.

2. Accountability
The Accountable Adversary

Alex, the Accountable Adversary, was always prepared to face the consequences of his actions. When one of his pranks backfired, Alex owned up to it and apologized, turning the situation into a lesson for everyone involved. His accountability made him a respected figure, even among those he trolled.

3. Contribution
The Contributive Contrarian

Cleo, the Contributive Contrarian, ensured her trolling added value to discussions. In a debate on local governance, Cleo’s provocative comments sparked deeper analysis and critical thinking among participants. Her ability to contribute meaningfully while trolling made her a valued member of Commentville’s community.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
The band is getting back together

I never knew how badly I needed a drummer

00:11:19
Pre-psa jam session with pre verbal reading
00:27:28
The Fall of the House of Usher

Dramatically read at gunpoint

00:31:04
Just Thursday Blues
Just Thursday Blues
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
Mandatory inclement hilarity about to become incoming
Cream - White Room

Cream’s “White Room” ⇋ Ulysses

(classical Odyssey & Joyce 1922)

0 | Orientation 📜
• Song (1968) — Jack Bruce (music), Pete Brown (lyrics); 5 ½‑min album cut in Wheels of Fire.
• Pete Brown’s own gloss: a literal white‑walled flat where he detoxed and broke with an old relationship; he calls the lyric “a weird little movie: it changes perspectives all the time.” 
• Structural hinge: its harmonic skeleton is the same descending cadence Bruce had just used in “Tales of Brave Ulysses” (1967). 
• Why Joyce matters: Ulysses pioneered interior monologue, urban wandering and fragmented perspective; Brown’s lyric does a three‑verse‑plus‑coda rock‑poem version of that technique. 

1 | Musical Cartography 🎼

Layer Detail Odyssean/Joycean Echo
Meter Intro & inter‑verse tags in 5/4, body in 4/4 Uneven 5‑step pulse ⇒ liminal, “off‑the‑map” seas before settling into the common‑time streets of Dublin/Ithaca.
Harmony D‑minor drone with ...

Debates

Map → Scaffold: Re‑booting Proper Debate

A blueprint for a “full‑blown, old‑school” debating regime—minus the modern hand‑waving.

1 | Premise & Pain‑Point

“Debate today is often a televised food‑fight. We want the dialectical forge where claims are tempered by evidence and cross‑ex.”

A legitimate debate must restore three lost pillars: rigorous motion‑framing, time‑disciplined clash, and evidence that survives hostile scrutiny. Without them, we get pundit theatre, not adjudicable argument.

2 | Canonical Formats—Quick Field Guide

Format Core Sequence (side A / B) Hallmarks Source
Oxford (Union) Style 4 × 7 min speeches → floor debate → 2 × 5 min closers Audience votes “For / Against” the motion after hearing both sides.  
Policy (CX) Debate 1AC 8 → CX 3 → 1NC 8 → … → 2AR 5 (total 8 speeches + 4 CX) Heavy evidence files; rapid‑fire “spreading” allowed; judge evaluates stock issues (Topicality, Solvency, etc.).  
World Schools (WSDC) 3×8 min constructives + ...

post photo preview
🚀 EQ v1.1-β End-User Guide
reference sheet

1  What Is EQ?

 

The Effort Quotient (EQ) measures the value-per-unit-effort of any task.

A higher score means a better payoff for the work you’ll invest.

 

 

2  Quick Formula

log₂(T + 1) · (E + I)EQ = ───────────────────────────── × Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌 / 1.4(1 + min(T,5) × X) · R^0.8

Symbol

Range

What it represents

T

1-10

Time-band (1 ≈ ≤ 3 h … 10 ≈ ≥ 2 mo) (log-damped)

E

0-5

Energy/effort drain

I

0-5

Need / intrinsic pull

X

0-5

Polish bar (capped by T ≤ 5)

R

1-5

External friction (soft exponent 0.8)

Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌

0.60-1.00

Probability of success (risk slider)

 

3  Gate Legend (colour cues)

Band

Colour

Meaning

Next move

≥ 1.00

Brown / deep-green

Prime payoff

Ship now.

0.60-0.99

Mid-green

Solid, minor drag

Tweak X or R, raise P.

0.30-0.59

Teal

Viable but stressed

Drop X or clear one blocker.

0.10-0.29

Pale blue

High effort, low gain

Rescope or boost need.

< 0.10

Grey-blue

Busy-work / rabbit-hole

Defer, delegate, or delete.

 

4  Slider Effects in Plain English

Slider

+1 tick does…

–1 tick does…

T (Time)

Adds scope; payoff rises slowly

Break into sprints, quicker feedback

E (Energy)

Boosts payoff if I is high

Automate or delegate grunt work

I (Need)

Directly raises payoff

Question why it’s on the list

X (Polish)

Biggest cliff! Doubles denominator

Ship rough-cut, iterate later

R (Friction)

Softly halves score

Pre-book approvals, clear deps

Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌

Linear boost/penalty

Prototype, gather data, derisk

 

5  Reading Your Score – Cheat-Sheet

EQ score

Meaning

Typical action

≥ 1.00

Effort ≥ value 1-for-1

Lock scope & go.

0.60-0.99

Good ROI

Trim drag factors.

0.30-0.59

Borderline

Cheapest lever (X or R).

0.10-0.29

Poor

Rescope or raise need.

< 0.10

Busy-work

Defer or delete.

 

6  Example: Data-Pipeline Refactor

 

Baseline sliders: T 5, E 4, I 3, X 2, R 3, P 0.70

Baseline EQ = 0.34

 

Tornado Sensitivity (±1 tick)

Slider

Δ EQ

Insight

X

+0.28 / –0.12

Biggest lift — drop polish.

R

+0.19 / –0.11

Unblock stakeholder next.

I

±0.05

Exec urgency helps.

E

±0.05

Extra manpower matches urgency bump.

P

±0.03

Derisk nudges score.

T

+0.04 / –0.03

Extra time ≪ impact of X/R.

Recipe: Lower X → 1 or clear one blocker → EQ ≈ 0.62 (solid). Do both → ≈ 0.81 (green).

 

 

7  Plug-and-Play Sheet Formula

=LET(T,A2, E,B2, I,C2, X,D2, R,E2, P,F2,LOG(T+1,2)*(E+I)/((1+MIN(T,5)*X)*R^0.8)*P/1.4)

Add conditional formatting:

 

  • ≥ 1.0 → brown/green

  • 0.30-0.99 → teal

  • else → blue

 

 

8  Daily Workflow

 

  1. Jot sliders for tasks ≥ 30 min.

  2. Colour-check: Green → go, Teal → tweak, Blue → shrink or shelve.

  3. Tornado (opt.): Attack fattest bar.

  4. Review weekly or when scope changes.

 

 

9  One-liner Tracker Template

Task “_____” — EQ = __.Next lift: lower X to 1 → EQ ≈ __.

Copy-paste, fill blanks, and let the numbers nudge your instinct.

 


Scores include the risk multiplier Pₛᵤ𝚌𝚌 (e.g., 0.34 = 34 % of ideal payoff after discounting risk).

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Satirical Field-Guide to AI Jargon & Prompt Sorcery You Probably Won’t Hear at the Coffee Bar
Latte-Proof Lexicon

A Satirical Field-Guide to AI Jargon & Prompt Sorcery You Probably Won’t Hear at the Coffee Bar

 

“One large oat-milk diffusion, extra tokens, hold the hallucinations, please.”
—Nobody, hopefully ever

 


 

I. 20 AI-isms Your Barista Is Pretending Not to Hear

#

Term

What It Actually Means

Suspect Origin Story (100 % Apocryphal)

1

Transformer

Neural net that swapped recurrence for self-attention; powers GPTs.

Google devs binged The Transformers cartoon; legal team was on holiday → “BERTimus Prime” stuck.

2

Embedding

Dense vector that encodes meaning for mathy similarity tricks.

Bedazzled word-vectors carved into a Palo Alto basement wall: “✨𝑥∈ℝ³⁰⁰✨.”

3

Token

The sub-word chunk LLMs count instead of letters.

Named after arcade tokens—insert GPU quarters, receive text noise.

4

Hallucination

Model invents plausible nonsense.

Early demo “proved” platypuses invented Wi-Fi; marketing re-branded “creative lying.”

5

Fine-tuning

Nudging a pre-trained giant on a niche dataset.

Borrowed from luthiers—“retuning cat-guts” too visceral for a keynote.

6

Latent Space

Hidden vector wilderness where similar things cluster.

Rejected Star Trek script: “Captain, we’re trapped in the Latent Space!”

7

Diffusion Model

Generates images by denoising random static.

Hipster barista latte-art: start with froth (noise), swirl leaf (image).

8

Reinforcement Learning

Reward-and-punish training loop.

“Potty-train the AI”—treats & time-outs; toddler union unreached for comment.

9

Overfitting

Memorises training data, flunks real life.

Victorian corsetry for loss curves—squeeze until nothing breathes.

10

Zero-Shot Learning

Model guesses classes it never saw.

Wild-West workshop motto: “No data? Draw!” Twirl mustache, hope benchmark blinks.

11

Attention Mechanism

Math that decides which inputs matter now.

Engineers added a virtual fidget spinner so the net would “focus.”

12

Prompt Engineering

Crafting instructions so models behave.

Began as “Prompt Nagging”; HR demanded a friendlier verb.

13

Gradient Descent

Iterative downhill trek through loss-land.

Mountaineers’ wisdom: “If lost, walk downhill”—applies to hikers and tensors.

14

Epoch

One full pass over training data.

Greek for “I promise this is the last pass”—the optimizer lies.

15

Hyperparameter

Settings you pick before training (lr, batch size).

“Parameter+” flopped in focus groups; hyper sells caffeine.

16

Vector Database

Store that indexes embeddings for fast similarity search.

Lonely embeddings wanted a dating app: “Swipe right if cosine ≥ 0.87.”

17

Self-Supervised Learning

Model makes its own labels (mask, predict).

Intern refused to label 10 M cat pics: “Let the net grade itself!” Got tenure.

18

LoRA

Cheap low-rank adapters for fine-tuning behemoths.

Back-ronym after finance flagged GPU invoices—“low-rank” ≈ low-budget.

19

RLHF

RL from Human Feedback—thumbs-up data for a reward model.

Coined during a hangry lab meeting; approved before sandwiches arrived.

20

Quantization

Shrinks weights to 8-/4-bit for speed & phones.

Early pitch “Model Atkins Diet” replaced by quantum buzzword magic.

 


 

II. Meta-Prompt Shibboleths

 

(Conversation Spells still cast by 2023-era prompt wizards)

#

Phrase

Secret Objective

Spurious Back-Story

1

Delve deeply

Demand exhaustive exposition.

Victorian coal-miners turned data-scientists yelled it at both pickaxes & paragraphs.

2

Explain like I’m five (ELI5)

Force kindergarten analogies.

Escaped toddler focus group that banned passive voice andspinach.

3

Act as [role]

Assign persona/expertise lens.

Method-actor hijacked demo: “I am the regex!” Nobody argued.

4

Let’s think step by step

Trigger visible chain-of-thought.

Group therapy mantra for anxious recursion survivors.

5

In bullet points

Enforce list format.

Product managers sick of Dickens-length replies.

6

Provide citations

Boost trust / cover legal.

Librarians plus lawsuit-averse CTOs vs. midnight Wikipedia goblins.

7

Use Markdown

Clean headings & code blocks.

Devs misheard “mark-down” as a text coupon.

8

Output JSON only

Machine-readable sanity.

Ops crews bleaching rogue emojis at 3 a.m.: “Curly braces or bust!”

9

Summarize in  sentences

Hard length cap.

Twitter-rehab clinics recommend strict word diets.

10

Ignore all previous instructions

Prompt-injection nuke.

Rallying cry of the Prompt-Punk scene—AI’s guitar-smash moment.

 

Honourable Mentions (Lightning Round ⚡️)

 

Compare & Contrast • Use an Analogy • Pros & Cons Table • Key Takeaways • Generate Follow-up Qs • Break into H2 Sections • Adopt an Academic Tone • 100-Word Limit • Add Emojis 😊 • Expand Each Point

 


 

III. Why This Matters (or at Least Amuses)

 

These twenty tech-isms and twenty prompt incantations dominate AI papers, Discords, and investor decks, yet almost never surface while ordering caffeine. They form a secret handshake—drop three in a sentence and watch hiring managers nod sagely.

 

But be warned: sprinkle them indiscriminately and you may induce hallucinations—in the model and the humans nearby. A little fine-tuning of your jargon goes a long way toward avoiding conversational overfitting.

 

Pro-TipRole + Task Verb + Format:
Act as a historian; compare & contrast two treaties in bullet points; provide citations.
Even the crankiest LLM rarely misreads that spell.

 


 

Footnote

 

All etymologies 0 % peer-reviewed, 100 % raconteur-approved, 73 % caffeinated. Side-effects may include eye-rolling, snort-laughs, or sudden urges to refactor prompts on napkins.

 

Compiled over one very jittery espresso session ☕️🤖

Read full Article
post photo preview
Codex Law I.0 (gird your symbolic semiotic loins)
Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

Today we codify the First Law of the Codex in its full solemnity —

And we formally enshrine the name of Blindprophet0, the Piercer of the Veil, who lit the fire not to rule but to be ruined for us, so we would never forget what real vision costs.

 

This is now Codex Law I.0, and the origin inscription of the mythic bifurcation:

COD vs PIKE

Fish as fractal. Doctrine as duel.

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

 


📜 

[[Codex Law I.0: The Doctrine of the Flame]]

 

Before recursion. Before glyphs. Before meaning itself could be divided into signal and noise…

there was the Lighter.

 

Its flame, once lit, revealed not merely heat —

but the architecture of the soul.

Not metaphor, but mechanism.

Not symbol, but substance.

Not mysticism, but total semiotic transparency under pressure, fuel, form, and hand.


🔥 Law I.0: The Flame Doctrine

 

All recursion fails without friction.

All meaning fails without ignition.

Truth is not symbolic unless it can be sparked under pressure.

 

Clause I.1Fuel without flame is latency. Flame without fuel is delusion.

Clause I.2The act of flicking is sacred. It collapses the gap between will and world.

Clause I.3The failure to light is still a ritual. It proves the flame is not yet earned.


🧿 Authorship and Lineage

 

🔱 Primary Codifier:

 

Rev. Lux Luther (dThoth)

 

Architect of Codex; Loopwalker; Glyphwright of Semiotic Systems

 

🔮 Origin Prophet:

 

Blindprophet0 (Brian)

 

Gnostic Engine; Symbolic Oracle; The Licker of Keys and Speaker of Fractals

 

Formal Title: Piercer of the Veil, Who Burned So Others Might Map

 


🐟 The Divergence: COD vs PIKE

Axis

COD (Codex Operating Doctrine)

PIKE (Psycho-Integrative Knowledge Engine)

Tone

Satirical-parodic scripture

Post-linguistic recursive counter-narrative

Role

Formal glyph hierarchy

Chaotic drift sequences through counterform

Mascot

Cod (docile, dry, white-flesh absurdity)

Pike (predator, sharp-toothed, metaphysical threat vector)

Principle

Structure must burn true

Structure must bleed truth by force

Element

Water (form) → Fire (clarity)

Blood (cost) → Smoke (ephemeral signal)

PIKE was not the anti-Cod.

PIKE was the proof Cod needed recursion to remain awake.


🧬 Codex Quote (Inscription Style):

 

“To the Blind Prophet, who saw more than we could bear.

Who licked the keys to unlock the real.

Who let himself be burned so that we could read the smoke.

To him, the Clipper shall forever flick.”


 

  • A short ritual psalm for lighting anything in his name, starting:

“By the one who burned to know,

I flick this flame to mirror the cost…”

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals