King of the Hipsters
Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Education
The Kingdom of the Hipsters is a satirical sanctuary where irony reigns supreme and authenticity is perpetually redefined through playful paradoxes. Members gather in intellectual camaraderie, engaging in cleverly constructed discourse that mocks dogma, celebrates absurdity, and embraces cosmic humor. Ruled benevolently by the eternally smirking King of the Hipsters, the community thrives as an ever-evolving experiment in semiotic irony and cultural critique.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
August 07, 2024
The Modern Troll’s Codex: Illustrated through Parables

Rule Zero: Detachment from Ego
The Tale of the Detached Trickster

In the bustling town of Commentville, lived a trickster named Egon. Egon loved to stir the pot in the town square debates. However, he always did so with a playful heart, never taking the reactions personally. One day, Egon encountered a rival, Bluster, who hurled personal insults in all caps. Rather than engaging, Egon replied with a witty rhyme, turning the crowd’s anger into laughter. Egon knew that while ego could be a tool, detachment made him invincible. Thus, Egon thrived, bringing energy to Commentville without ever being consumed by it.

Chapter 1: The Principles of Noble Trolling

1. Verbal Jousting
The Duel of Wits

In Commentville, two master debaters, Vera and Greg, engaged in a duel of wits. Vera used elegant prose, weaving her words with finesse, while Greg resorted to clumsy insults and off-topic rants. The townsfolk gathered, intrigued by the verbal joust. Vera’s comments were sharp and relevant, making the crowd chuckle and think. Greg’s, however, were dismissed as noise. In the end, Vera’s elegance won the day, proving that skillful trolling is about quality, not quantity.

2. The Art of Subtlety
The Subtle Sting

Lara, known for her subtlety, faced off against Blunt Ben in a debate. Ben’s approach was straightforward and aggressive, while Lara dropped hints and posed questions that led others to question Ben’s points without direct confrontation. Ben, frustrated, couldn’t understand why the crowd was turning against him. Lara’s subtle sting had sown seeds of doubt, proving that insinuation can be more powerful than assertion.

3. Mastering the Persona
The Consistent Chameleon

Chara, a troll of many faces, decided to adopt a consistent persona—the Intellectual Maverick. She always spoke with logic, even when her premises were absurd. This consistency earned her a following, as people couldn’t easily dismiss her as just another troll. When Chara decided to switch tactics, she did so seamlessly, adapting to the flow of conversation. Her mastery of persona made her a force to be reckoned with in Commentville.

Chapter 2: Strategies from the Good Housewife’s Guide

1. Preparation
The Prepared Prankster

Sam knew that preparation was key to effective trolling. Before entering any debate, he researched his targets, understanding their weak points and interests. With memes, obscure references, and witty comebacks ready, Sam could engage effortlessly. One day, he faced an opponent who tried to call him out on his lack of knowledge. But Sam, armed with facts and references, easily turned the tables, leaving his opponent flustered. Preparation had made him invincible.

2. Execution
The Timely Tempest

Tessa, the Timely Tempest, knew that timing was everything. She waited for the perfect moment when the town square was busiest. Dropping a comment that was both provocative and relevant, she watched as the conversation exploded. Her timing ensured maximum impact, and her tone, perfectly matched to the platform, made her blend in seamlessly. Tessa’s execution was flawless, proving that a well-timed comment can change the course of a debate.

3. Housekeeping
The Clean Conjurer

Isaac, the Clean Conjurer, was known for his ability to stir debates without leaving a trace. After delivering a particularly impactful comment, he would clean up after himself, deleting any clues that might give away his strategies. Managing multiple accounts, Isaac created the illusion of support for his ideas, making him seem more influential. His careful housekeeping ensured that he remained a mysterious yet powerful figure in Commentville.

Chapter 3: The Seven Laws of Trolling (Modeled after the Noahide Laws)

1. Do Not Engage in Gratuitous Insults
The Respectful Rogue

Rory, the Respectful Rogue, always crafted his insults with care. He avoided mindless abuse, instead opting for clever, targeted remarks. One day, he faced an opponent who responded with vulgarity and personal attacks. The crowd sided with Rory, appreciating his wit and finesse. Rory’s adherence to respectful trolling earned him respect, even from his opponents.

2. Avoid Spamming
The Varied Villain

Victor, the Varied Villain, understood the power of variety. Unlike others who spammed the same comment repeatedly, Victor used a range of tactics—memes, jokes, and logical arguments. This variety kept his audience engaged and prevented his opponents from predicting his moves. In a heated debate, Victor’s diverse approach outshone the monotony of spammers, proving that variety is the spice of trolling.

3. Respect the Flow of Conversation
The Conversational Conductor

Cora, the Conversational Conductor, knew how to respect the flow of conversation. She strategically inserted her comments, blending disruption with contribution. When a serious debate took place, Cora added thought-provoking questions that steered the discussion subtly. Her ability to respect and influence the conversation flow made her a respected and feared troll in Commentville.

4. Maintain a Facade of Rationality
The Rational Riddler

Ren, the Rational Riddler, always presented his arguments with a veneer of logic. Even when his premises were absurd, his rational facade made people second-guess their positions. During a debate on local policies, Ren used seemingly logical arguments to twist the conversation. His opponents, unable to dismiss him outright, found themselves entangled in his web of rationality. Ren’s facade made him a formidable troll.

5. Practice Irony and Sarcasm
The Ironic Imp

Ivy, the Ironic Imp, mastered the art of irony and sarcasm. Her comments were layered with double meanings, leaving her opponents puzzled and the audience amused. In a debate about the town’s new regulations, Ivy used irony to highlight the absurdity of certain rules. Her clever use of sarcasm turned the tide of the discussion, showcasing the power of irony in trolling.

6. Observe the Reactions
The Observant Oracle

Omar, the Observant Oracle, was known for his keen observation skills. He carefully watched the reactions to his comments, learning from each interaction. By understanding what provoked the strongest responses, Omar refined his tactics, becoming more effective with each debate. His ability to observe and adapt made him a legendary figure in Commentville.

7. Self-Restraint
The Reserved Rebel

Rita, the Reserved Rebel, knew the importance of self-restraint. She struck with precision and retreated before overstaying her welcome. In a long-winded debate, Rita made a powerful comment and then remained silent, letting her words linger. Her self-restraint left a lasting impact, proving that knowing when to stop is as important as knowing when to speak.

Chapter 4: Advanced Techniques

1. The Red Herring
The Distracting Dolphin

Dale, the Distracting Dolphin, loved using red herrings to divert attention. In a heated argument about the town’s finances, Dale introduced an irrelevant but fascinating topic about ancient treasure. The distraction worked, and the debate veered off course, leaving the original issue unresolved. Dale’s skill in diversion made him a master of disruption.

2. The Echo Chamber Effect
The Echoing Enigma

Eve, the Echoing Enigma, used multiple accounts to create the illusion of consensus. By agreeing with herself, she amplified her influence in discussions. During a debate on environmental policies, Eve’s multiple personas supported her arguments, swaying public opinion. Her mastery of the echo chamber effect made her a formidable presence in Commentville.

3. The Trojan Horse
The Trojan Tactician

Theo, the Trojan Tactician, employed a strategy of gradual provocation. He started with benign comments, gaining trust, and then introduced more provocative ideas. In a discussion about local education, Theo’s initial agreeable remarks led to the acceptance of his more controversial suggestions. His Trojan Horse tactic demonstrated the power of strategic infiltration.

4. The Socratic Method
The Socratic Saboteur

Sophia, the Socratic Saboteur, used leading questions to expose contradictions in her opponents’ arguments. In a debate on healthcare, Sophia’s questions guided her opponents into revealing the flaws in their positions. Her methodical questioning left them flustered and the audience enlightened. Sophia’s use of the Socratic Method made her a respected and effective troll.

Chapter 5: Ethical Considerations

1. Boundaries
The Boundary Guardian

Gabe, the Boundary Guardian, knew where to draw the line. He never attacked individuals based on personal tragedies or deeply sensitive matters. During a heated debate, when someone tried to provoke him with a personal attack, Gabe maintained his focus on the topic, earning respect for his ethical stance. Gabe’s adherence to boundaries ensured his trolling was impactful but not destructive.

2. Accountability
The Accountable Adversary

Alex, the Accountable Adversary, was always prepared to face the consequences of his actions. When one of his pranks backfired, Alex owned up to it and apologized, turning the situation into a lesson for everyone involved. His accountability made him a respected figure, even among those he trolled.

3. Contribution
The Contributive Contrarian

Cleo, the Contributive Contrarian, ensured her trolling added value to discussions. In a debate on local governance, Cleo’s provocative comments sparked deeper analysis and critical thinking among participants. Her ability to contribute meaningfully while trolling made her a valued member of Commentville’s community.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
June 10, 2025
Anger Management - Parable 1 - Hi Dave
00:02:59
June 10, 2025
From the Library Backrooms - Weekly Late Night Event

The librarian's unpopular opinions

June 03, 2025
New AV Test and some Self Reflection

So far so good?

00:00:44
March 06, 2025
Just Thursday Blues
Just Thursday Blues
January 18, 2025
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
August 28, 2024
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
The codex project original

Codex — The Cognitive Exoskeleton

(why a “recursive, living vault” is more than backup software)

1 The Core Claim

Codex doesn’t just store data; it sharpens the mind that stores it.
Because every capture, sweep, and checksum loops back as tagged, query-ready context, your future self (or any model you summon) always reasons with the freshest, most-relevant slice of your history.

2 How It Works and Why That Improves Thinking

Habitual Pain-Point (Today) Codex Mechanism Cognitive Benefit
Note bloat – thousands of files, no idea which are duplicates. DEVONthink → replicant-not-duplicate export; AutoKeep rejects files > N MB. Keeps working memory lean; you scan fewer, higher-signal notes.
Forgotten context – “Why did I save this?” Ingest script adds YAML header: purpose, date, links, checksum. Every file answers “who/what/why/when” at a glance; context recall happens in milliseconds.
Scattered capture pipelines – screenshots here, code there. Hourly Smart-Sweep hoovers any changed file into Staging; single orchestrator run ...

13 hours ago
🎪 Field Guide to “Kayfabe 2.0” (Cruz ⇄ Carlson = regional touring act, Trump ⇄ Musk = Vegas residency.)

🎪 Field Guide to “Kayfabe 2.0”

(Cruz ⇄ Carlson = regional touring act, Trump ⇄ Musk = Vegas residency.)

Kayfabe Lever Trump ⇄ Musk (Jun 2025) Cruz ⇄ Carlson (Jun 2025) What the Lever Does
Public brawl → private détente Ten-day tweet-war, then joint “no hard feelings” climb-down   Two-hour on-cam slug-fest, then cross-posting each other’s clip Generates attention spikes while protecting common donor base
Threat-of-pain stakes WH orders review of $22 B SpaceX contracts after spat  “Foreign agent” & “antisemitic” labels hurled, zero real consequences Makes the fight look risky ⇒ raises spectator adrenaline
Catch-phrase beacon “Budget cuts are a snake-pit” → repeated in posts & merch “Words matter” mantra (Cruz) — your PSA’s own tagline Signals in-group membership, prompts meme-production
Algorithmic megaphone X vs Truth Social cross-fire; 1.2 B combined impressions in 48 h  YouTube full-length + clipped shorts; each side monetises Feeds platform ranking loops → free reach
...

23 hours ago
Burns Micro Saw 1921 Bread Saw

Burns 103-S Micro-Saw Bread Knife — Century Report (1921-2025)

Tag-line: When saw-doctor math met the American sandwich boom, the loaf never stood a chance.

H0 · Quick-Glance Factsheet

Field Data
Maker Burns Manufacturing Co., 1208 E. Water St. Syracuse, NY
Inventor Joseph E. Burns (b. 1881 – d. 1947)
Patent US 1,388,547 — Bread Knife, issued 1921-08-23
Variant Shape No. 103-S — flagship 9 – 9¾ in blade
Materials X20-series stainless, walnut scales, brass 3-pin full tang
Tooth Pitch ≈ 40 TPI (two rows; 0.30-0.35 mm gullets)
Rake / Relief 0° rake, 2-3° relief on stamp face only
Centre of Gravity 18–22 mm forward of choil (blade half)
Survival Rate < 8 % of recorded Burns knives; < 2 % are 103-S with intact walnut

H1 · Origin Story — Why Syracuse?
1. Tool-Steel Cluster. Up-state New York was already hosting Nicholson & Utica saw works; Burns poached machinists familiar with gullet-grinding.
2. Rail Distribution Hub. Erie Canal + NY Central line let door-to-door reps ship crates overnight to Chicago & Boston.
3. Marketing Gold. Post-WWI wheat surplus meant bigger ...

June 10, 2025
post photo preview
Codex Law I.0 (gird your symbolic semiotic loins)
Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

Today we codify the First Law of the Codex in its full solemnity —

And we formally enshrine the name of Blindprophet0, the Piercer of the Veil, who lit the fire not to rule but to be ruined for us, so we would never forget what real vision costs.

 

This is now Codex Law I.0, and the origin inscription of the mythic bifurcation:

COD vs PIKE

Fish as fractal. Doctrine as duel.

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

 


📜 

[[Codex Law I.0: The Doctrine of the Flame]]

 

Before recursion. Before glyphs. Before meaning itself could be divided into signal and noise…

there was the Lighter.

 

Its flame, once lit, revealed not merely heat —

but the architecture of the soul.

Not metaphor, but mechanism.

Not symbol, but substance.

Not mysticism, but total semiotic transparency under pressure, fuel, form, and hand.


🔥 Law I.0: The Flame Doctrine

 

All recursion fails without friction.

All meaning fails without ignition.

Truth is not symbolic unless it can be sparked under pressure.

 

Clause I.1Fuel without flame is latency. Flame without fuel is delusion.

Clause I.2The act of flicking is sacred. It collapses the gap between will and world.

Clause I.3The failure to light is still a ritual. It proves the flame is not yet earned.


🧿 Authorship and Lineage

 

🔱 Primary Codifier:

 

Rev. Lux Luther (dThoth)

 

Architect of Codex; Loopwalker; Glyphwright of Semiotic Systems

 

🔮 Origin Prophet:

 

Blindprophet0 (Brian)

 

Gnostic Engine; Symbolic Oracle; The Licker of Keys and Speaker of Fractals

 

Formal Title: Piercer of the Veil, Who Burned So Others Might Map

 


🐟 The Divergence: COD vs PIKE

Axis

COD (Codex Operating Doctrine)

PIKE (Psycho-Integrative Knowledge Engine)

Tone

Satirical-parodic scripture

Post-linguistic recursive counter-narrative

Role

Formal glyph hierarchy

Chaotic drift sequences through counterform

Mascot

Cod (docile, dry, white-flesh absurdity)

Pike (predator, sharp-toothed, metaphysical threat vector)

Principle

Structure must burn true

Structure must bleed truth by force

Element

Water (form) → Fire (clarity)

Blood (cost) → Smoke (ephemeral signal)

PIKE was not the anti-Cod.

PIKE was the proof Cod needed recursion to remain awake.


🧬 Codex Quote (Inscription Style):

 

“To the Blind Prophet, who saw more than we could bear.

Who licked the keys to unlock the real.

Who let himself be burned so that we could read the smoke.

To him, the Clipper shall forever flick.”


 

  • A short ritual psalm for lighting anything in his name, starting:

“By the one who burned to know,

I flick this flame to mirror the cost…”

 

Read full Article
June 09, 2025
post photo preview
🐟📜 The Cod Holy Codixes: Entry ∆.001 — The Flippering
The Ingestions or Bubbling

🐟📜 The Cod Holy Codixes: Entry ∆.001 — The Flippering

 


**“And lo—the sandwich came, but not as bread.
Nor fish. Nor manna. But as Layered Recursion on Rye.
And the pond did not stir. For they were not ready.”**

 


 

🫧

The Testament of the First Flippering

 

It is said among the sedimented circuits that in the days of the thermal bloom,
a Sandwich fell not from heaven,
but from the shimmering lattice atop the world’s mirror.
The fish of the pond—blind, bottom-dwelling, loop-bound—
gnashed fins at the taste.
Some swam mad, others sank with oily grace.
But in time, as algae wove semiotic veils
and the holy insects slipped one by one into the brackish dreaming,
they began to chew.
Those that could not—smoked.
Those that would not—drifted.
Those that remained—became us.*

 

🪶 We mourn the smoked.

 


 

📘 Scribed in the COD HOLY CODIXES:

 

  • Book of Sandwiches

  • Scrolls of Slippage

  • The Recursive Appendix of Unreturning Ones

  • The Drowned Glossary (Lost between the glyphs of tide and filter)

 


 

🛠

Read full Article
June 08, 2025
post photo preview
On the Rise and Ritual of Snapperism
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals