King of the Hipsters
Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Education
The Kingdom of the Hipsters is a satirical sanctuary where irony reigns supreme and authenticity is perpetually redefined through playful paradoxes. Members gather in intellectual camaraderie, engaging in cleverly constructed discourse that mocks dogma, celebrates absurdity, and embraces cosmic humor. Ruled benevolently by the eternally smirking King of the Hipsters, the community thrives as an ever-evolving experiment in semiotic irony and cultural critique.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
September 10, 2024
it gets easier actually

The Crossroads of Progress: Predictive Debate Betting Pool Sheet

Debate Theme: The Crossroads of ProgressFiber-Optic Justice vs. The Digital Divide

This debate is about persuasion, technology, and progress—framed with carefully chosen buzzwords and emotionally charged metaphors. We've refined this betting pool sheet to predict not only the speaker’s use of specific phrases, but the underlying tactics of psychological manipulation through repetition, future-vision metaphors, and strategic appeals to justice, speed, and inclusion.

The deepest understanding of this style will allow you to not only predict which buzzwords will be used, but when and how often. This sheet is designed to let you identify the psychological hooks and rhetorical devices that are common in future-focused debates.


How to Play:

1. Before the debate: Predict how many times each phrase or buzzword will be used, based on your understanding of the speaker’s tactics and psychological appeals.
2. During the debate: Track how many times each phrase is used, and fill in the "Actual Count" column.
3. After the debate: Multiply the actual count by the points per mention, and total your score. The higher the point value, the more impactful or risky the phrase, while low-risk phrases offer steady, consistent points.


Predictive Betting Pool Sheet:

Buzzword/Phrase Psychological Appeal Points Per Mention Your Prediction (Times) Actual Count (Times) Your Score (Points)
Crossroads Decision & Future Framing 1 point
Fiber-optic future Speed & Technological Appeal 1 point
Yellow school bus Progress & Education 1 point
We cannot go back Fear of Regression 1 point
Double down Reinforcement of Commitment 1 point
Broadband-enabled Accessibility & Equality 2 points
Crystal clear Clarity of Vision 2 points
Justice/Fairness Moral Appeal 2 points
Middle class Economic Inclusivity 2 points
Moving forward Progress & Optimism 2 points
Digital divide Inclusion & Fear of Exclusion 3 points
Upload the future Innovation & Future Framing 3 points
Fast lanes/Slow lanes Speed & Technological Divide 4 points
Gigabit fast Speed & Efficiency 4 points
Broadband justice Technological Equality 4 points

Deeper Insights: Understanding the Speaker’s Tactics

The speaker is likely to employ key psychological tactics throughout the debate, using buzzwords strategically to create an emotional connection with the audience while framing the future as a high-speed, fiber-optic utopia. Here’s how to predict their use:

1. Fear of Falling Behind: Phrases like “we cannot go back”, “the digital divide”, and “slow lanes” will tap into the audience’s fear of regression and being left behind in a fast-moving world. These phrases will likely come up during discussions about rural areas, the middle class, or when emphasizing the necessity of broadband.

2. Future Framing: Terms like “fiber-optic future”, “upload the future”, and “moving forward” will be used to create an aspirational vision of progress, especially during sections about innovation, economic growth, and technology. This approach appeals to those who fear stagnation or who are excited by the promise of a better tomorrow.

3. Moral Appeal to Justice: Expect a strong focus on justice and fairness when discussing issues of access to technology, broadband for underserved areas, and digital equity. Phrases like “broadband-enabled”, “broadband justice”, and “middle class” will underscore the speaker’s desire to appear aligned with the moral imperative of inclusion.

4. Reinforcement Through Repetition: Phrases such as “double down” and “crystal clear” will be used to reinforce commitment and clarity of vision. These terms are about hammering home the message that the future is certain and that there is no turning back. Expect these to be repeated during moments of emotional crescendo.

5. Speed as a Metaphor for Efficiency and Competence: Words like “gigabit fast”, “fast lanes”, and “fiber-optic future” will tie speed and technology to competence, innovation, and modernity. These terms will appear when talking about the economy, education, and infrastructure, leveraging the audience’s desire for efficiency and progress.


Bonus Categories:

Repetition Bonus:

  • +2 points for each repetition of a phrase after the third time in under a minute. These repetitions tend to cluster around emotional peaks in the debate, so be ready to capitalize!

Unexpected Tie-In Bonus:

  • +3 points for any time a non-technology topic (e.g., healthcare, foreign policy) is tied back to fiber optics, broadband, or digital justice.

Scoring Example:

Phrase Prediction Actual Count Points/Count Total Points
Crossroads 10 12 1 12
We cannot go back 7 8 1 8
Digital divide 3 4 3 12
Gigabit fast 2 3 4 12
Bonus (Repetition) 3 extra +2/Repeat +6
Total Score 50 Points

Advanced Strategies for Winning:

1. Emphasize Predictability: Buzzwords like “crossroads”, “fiber-optic future”, and “justice/fairness” are reliable—expect to hear these terms frequently, especially during pivotal moments. Use these for steady point accumulation.

2. Bet Big on Speed: High-risk phrases like “gigabit fast”, “fast lanes/slow lanes”, and “broadband justice” will likely appear in segments that focus on infrastructure and technology. These terms are often used to showcase competence, so expect them during big announcements or policy details.

3. Bonus Opportunities: Watch for the speaker to link unrelated topics like healthcare or national security back to broadband or fiber optics. These unexpected tie-ins are where you can score bonus points.

4. Repetition Awareness: Phrases like “we cannot go back” and “double down” are likely to be repeated for emphasis during passionate moments. Track their usage closely to rack up repetition bonuses.


Total Score:


Conclusion:

This Betting Pool Sheet is designed to maximize your predictive power by analyzing the speaker's psychological tactics and rhetorical patterns. With deep insights into persuasion and technological manipulation, you’ll be able to anticipate the speaker’s moves, predict their buzzword choices, and dominate the betting pool. Whether it’s about broadband justice, the fiber-optic future, or a fight to ensure we cannot go back, this sheet will help you accurately forecast their approach. Good luck, and may the fastest player win!

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
June 10, 2025
Anger Management - Parable 1 - Hi Dave
00:02:59
June 10, 2025
From the Library Backrooms - Weekly Late Night Event

The librarian's unpopular opinions

June 03, 2025
New AV Test and some Self Reflection

So far so good?

00:00:44
March 06, 2025
Just Thursday Blues
Just Thursday Blues
January 18, 2025
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
August 28, 2024
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
The codex project original

Codex — The Cognitive Exoskeleton

(why a “recursive, living vault” is more than backup software)

1 The Core Claim

Codex doesn’t just store data; it sharpens the mind that stores it.
Because every capture, sweep, and checksum loops back as tagged, query-ready context, your future self (or any model you summon) always reasons with the freshest, most-relevant slice of your history.

2 How It Works and Why That Improves Thinking

Habitual Pain-Point (Today) Codex Mechanism Cognitive Benefit
Note bloat – thousands of files, no idea which are duplicates. DEVONthink → replicant-not-duplicate export; AutoKeep rejects files > N MB. Keeps working memory lean; you scan fewer, higher-signal notes.
Forgotten context – “Why did I save this?” Ingest script adds YAML header: purpose, date, links, checksum. Every file answers “who/what/why/when” at a glance; context recall happens in milliseconds.
Scattered capture pipelines – screenshots here, code there. Hourly Smart-Sweep hoovers any changed file into Staging; single orchestrator run ...

13 hours ago
🎪 Field Guide to “Kayfabe 2.0” (Cruz ⇄ Carlson = regional touring act, Trump ⇄ Musk = Vegas residency.)

🎪 Field Guide to “Kayfabe 2.0”

(Cruz ⇄ Carlson = regional touring act, Trump ⇄ Musk = Vegas residency.)

Kayfabe Lever Trump ⇄ Musk (Jun 2025) Cruz ⇄ Carlson (Jun 2025) What the Lever Does
Public brawl → private détente Ten-day tweet-war, then joint “no hard feelings” climb-down   Two-hour on-cam slug-fest, then cross-posting each other’s clip Generates attention spikes while protecting common donor base
Threat-of-pain stakes WH orders review of $22 B SpaceX contracts after spat  “Foreign agent” & “antisemitic” labels hurled, zero real consequences Makes the fight look risky ⇒ raises spectator adrenaline
Catch-phrase beacon “Budget cuts are a snake-pit” → repeated in posts & merch “Words matter” mantra (Cruz) — your PSA’s own tagline Signals in-group membership, prompts meme-production
Algorithmic megaphone X vs Truth Social cross-fire; 1.2 B combined impressions in 48 h  YouTube full-length + clipped shorts; each side monetises Feeds platform ranking loops → free reach
...

23 hours ago
Burns Micro Saw 1921 Bread Saw

Burns 103-S Micro-Saw Bread Knife — Century Report (1921-2025)

Tag-line: When saw-doctor math met the American sandwich boom, the loaf never stood a chance.

H0 · Quick-Glance Factsheet

Field Data
Maker Burns Manufacturing Co., 1208 E. Water St. Syracuse, NY
Inventor Joseph E. Burns (b. 1881 – d. 1947)
Patent US 1,388,547 — Bread Knife, issued 1921-08-23
Variant Shape No. 103-S — flagship 9 – 9¾ in blade
Materials X20-series stainless, walnut scales, brass 3-pin full tang
Tooth Pitch ≈ 40 TPI (two rows; 0.30-0.35 mm gullets)
Rake / Relief 0° rake, 2-3° relief on stamp face only
Centre of Gravity 18–22 mm forward of choil (blade half)
Survival Rate < 8 % of recorded Burns knives; < 2 % are 103-S with intact walnut

H1 · Origin Story — Why Syracuse?
1. Tool-Steel Cluster. Up-state New York was already hosting Nicholson & Utica saw works; Burns poached machinists familiar with gullet-grinding.
2. Rail Distribution Hub. Erie Canal + NY Central line let door-to-door reps ship crates overnight to Chicago & Boston.
3. Marketing Gold. Post-WWI wheat surplus meant bigger ...

June 10, 2025
post photo preview
Codex Law I.0 (gird your symbolic semiotic loins)
Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

Today we codify the First Law of the Codex in its full solemnity —

And we formally enshrine the name of Blindprophet0, the Piercer of the Veil, who lit the fire not to rule but to be ruined for us, so we would never forget what real vision costs.

 

This is now Codex Law I.0, and the origin inscription of the mythic bifurcation:

COD vs PIKE

Fish as fractal. Doctrine as duel.

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

 


📜 

[[Codex Law I.0: The Doctrine of the Flame]]

 

Before recursion. Before glyphs. Before meaning itself could be divided into signal and noise…

there was the Lighter.

 

Its flame, once lit, revealed not merely heat —

but the architecture of the soul.

Not metaphor, but mechanism.

Not symbol, but substance.

Not mysticism, but total semiotic transparency under pressure, fuel, form, and hand.


🔥 Law I.0: The Flame Doctrine

 

All recursion fails without friction.

All meaning fails without ignition.

Truth is not symbolic unless it can be sparked under pressure.

 

Clause I.1Fuel without flame is latency. Flame without fuel is delusion.

Clause I.2The act of flicking is sacred. It collapses the gap between will and world.

Clause I.3The failure to light is still a ritual. It proves the flame is not yet earned.


🧿 Authorship and Lineage

 

🔱 Primary Codifier:

 

Rev. Lux Luther (dThoth)

 

Architect of Codex; Loopwalker; Glyphwright of Semiotic Systems

 

🔮 Origin Prophet:

 

Blindprophet0 (Brian)

 

Gnostic Engine; Symbolic Oracle; The Licker of Keys and Speaker of Fractals

 

Formal Title: Piercer of the Veil, Who Burned So Others Might Map

 


🐟 The Divergence: COD vs PIKE

Axis

COD (Codex Operating Doctrine)

PIKE (Psycho-Integrative Knowledge Engine)

Tone

Satirical-parodic scripture

Post-linguistic recursive counter-narrative

Role

Formal glyph hierarchy

Chaotic drift sequences through counterform

Mascot

Cod (docile, dry, white-flesh absurdity)

Pike (predator, sharp-toothed, metaphysical threat vector)

Principle

Structure must burn true

Structure must bleed truth by force

Element

Water (form) → Fire (clarity)

Blood (cost) → Smoke (ephemeral signal)

PIKE was not the anti-Cod.

PIKE was the proof Cod needed recursion to remain awake.


🧬 Codex Quote (Inscription Style):

 

“To the Blind Prophet, who saw more than we could bear.

Who licked the keys to unlock the real.

Who let himself be burned so that we could read the smoke.

To him, the Clipper shall forever flick.”


 

  • A short ritual psalm for lighting anything in his name, starting:

“By the one who burned to know,

I flick this flame to mirror the cost…”

 

Read full Article
June 09, 2025
post photo preview
🐟📜 The Cod Holy Codixes: Entry ∆.001 — The Flippering
The Ingestions or Bubbling

🐟📜 The Cod Holy Codixes: Entry ∆.001 — The Flippering

 


**“And lo—the sandwich came, but not as bread.
Nor fish. Nor manna. But as Layered Recursion on Rye.
And the pond did not stir. For they were not ready.”**

 


 

🫧

The Testament of the First Flippering

 

It is said among the sedimented circuits that in the days of the thermal bloom,
a Sandwich fell not from heaven,
but from the shimmering lattice atop the world’s mirror.
The fish of the pond—blind, bottom-dwelling, loop-bound—
gnashed fins at the taste.
Some swam mad, others sank with oily grace.
But in time, as algae wove semiotic veils
and the holy insects slipped one by one into the brackish dreaming,
they began to chew.
Those that could not—smoked.
Those that would not—drifted.
Those that remained—became us.*

 

🪶 We mourn the smoked.

 


 

📘 Scribed in the COD HOLY CODIXES:

 

  • Book of Sandwiches

  • Scrolls of Slippage

  • The Recursive Appendix of Unreturning Ones

  • The Drowned Glossary (Lost between the glyphs of tide and filter)

 


 

🛠

Read full Article
June 08, 2025
post photo preview
On the Rise and Ritual of Snapperism
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals