King of the Hipsters
Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Education
The Kingdom of the Hipsters is a satirical sanctuary where irony reigns supreme and authenticity is perpetually redefined through playful paradoxes. Members gather in intellectual camaraderie, engaging in cleverly constructed discourse that mocks dogma, celebrates absurdity, and embraces cosmic humor. Ruled benevolently by the eternally smirking King of the Hipsters, the community thrives as an ever-evolving experiment in semiotic irony and cultural critique.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
November 13, 2024
Chapter 1 - a transcription

Here’s a polished transcription:

Light, Color, Waves, and Sound: An Introduction

In the mysterious writings of the ancient prophet Daniel, you can read his prediction of an extraordinary new age that would arrive far into the future, when “many will travel to and fro, and knowledge will vastly increase.” Daniel wrote these words at a time when travel was rare, the camel was the fastest means of transport, oxen plowed the fields, and men labored from dawn to dusk to make a living—over 2,000 years ago in the mighty kingdom of Babylon.

We live in that age, foretold by Daniel—the age of technology, electronics, and nuclear power, an age when knowledge has indeed exploded. Today, there are more scientists and engineers alive than have ever lived in all of history put together. People travel to and fro in fast cars and supersonic aircraft, and world travel and communication have shrunk the planet into a global village. We now possess the awesome power to destroy all life on Earth, leaving it as a blackened ball silently spinning in space.

This book is designed to help you understand the fundamental laws of science that have made such amazing progress possible and to show how technology exploits these laws to improve the quality and comfort of our lives. The reading sections explain the important ideas. Study them carefully, reading them over two or three times if necessary, and make sure you understand them. If anything is unclear, make a note of it and discuss it later with your teacher. Pay special attention to the sections printed in italics.

Nobody else can learn for you, just as nobody else can build your muscles or make you fit. So, get fully involved in the practical activities and develop your skills. Do not let yourself become a mere spectator. The analysis items will test your understanding of the practical work. In the question sections, the first items will test your recall and basic understanding of the ideas studied. This will usually lead to an analysis of useful devices or everyday applications of science. The starred questions are intended to be more challenging—ask your teacher if you get stuck.

Educated people know how to use resource books to find information for themselves. For this reason, you will find library items that allow you to develop your research skills. Your teacher may then give you the chance to develop your speaking skills by reporting your findings back to the class. The greatest resource of any nation is not coal, oil, or even gold deposits; it is the creative power of its people, and creativity can be developed by practice. Therefore, there are two other types of questions. Investigation items require you to design your own experiments, which may then be carried out in the lab. Design items ask you to solve a problem by inventing and designing.

Now, we begin the first section on page five for those keeping track at home. By the way, this is ISBN 0-721787-8, and we’re on page five.

Contents
1. Light (Page 5)

A simple definition of light is that it is what makes things visible. We see things only because they reflect light to our eyes or because they produce their own light. Luminous objects, such as the sun, produce their own light; most objects are non-luminous and do not. So, strange as it sounds, we would actually be invisible if there were no light to reflect off of us. Without light, nothing would be visible, and life would be exceedingly difficult—an understatement. No wonder knowledge is often compared to light.

The ancient Greeks were interested in light. Pythagoras taught that some kind of ray shot out of the eye and bounced back when objects were looked at. Today, we believe that light simply enters the eye for vision, with nothing emitted from it. The Greeks knew that light traveled in straight lines and that in reflection, the angle of reflection was equal to the angle of incidence—the angle at which the light hits a mirror.

The ancient Babylonians performed eye operations and discovered the small convex lens in the eye. They removed lenses made opaque by growths called cataracts. Lenses were made from transparent minerals and semi-precious stones, then later ground out of glass blocks. The word “lens” comes from the name “lentil,” because the lens resembles the shape of a lentil seed.

Around A.D. 150, Ptolemy wrote a five-volume work on optics, the study of light. He knew that a ray of light was bent or refracted when it passed from air into water. He also understood that light from a star bent as it entered the Earth’s atmosphere, causing a star near the horizon to appear higher in the sky than it actually is. The sun is affected similarly. However, Ptolemy still believed that light rays started in the eye or that something left the eye and joined with the light for the return journey.

By the Middle Ages, lenses were in common use. It was found that older people could read better with a magnifying convex lens. The next step was to mount the lenses in frames to make spectacles. This was done during the time of Roger Bacon, around A.D. 1286. In his book Opus Majus, Bacon used ray diagrams to explain the action of a convex lens.

In 1604, Kepler correctly explained that long- and short-sightedness was due to the eye lens not focusing rays on the retina properly. As early as 1675, Ole Rømer was able to estimate the speed of light from observations of Jupiter’s satellites and achieved a value about 75% accurate. However, Galileo insisted that light traveled instantaneously because he could not measure the time it took for light to reflect back from a distant mirror. Rømer succeeded because he used very large distances in space.

Today, we know that light in a vacuum travels at 300 million meters per second, or 186,000 miles per second—one million times the speed of sound. The distances in space are so vast that they are measured in light-years, the distance light travels in one year. Even with these incredibly large units, the nearest star to the Sun, Alpha Centauri, is 4.3 light-years away. This means that when we look at this star, we are seeing light that began its journey 4.3 years ago. There are objects in the universe thousands of light-years away.

Thank you, J.A. Thomas. Alright, I’ll pause here, and then we’ll move on to the questions.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
June 10, 2025
Anger Management - Parable 1 - Hi Dave
00:02:59
June 10, 2025
From the Library Backrooms - Weekly Late Night Event

The librarian's unpopular opinions

June 03, 2025
New AV Test and some Self Reflection

So far so good?

00:00:44
March 06, 2025
Just Thursday Blues
Just Thursday Blues
January 18, 2025
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
August 28, 2024
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
The codex project original

Codex — The Cognitive Exoskeleton

(why a “recursive, living vault” is more than backup software)

1 The Core Claim

Codex doesn’t just store data; it sharpens the mind that stores it.
Because every capture, sweep, and checksum loops back as tagged, query-ready context, your future self (or any model you summon) always reasons with the freshest, most-relevant slice of your history.

2 How It Works and Why That Improves Thinking

Habitual Pain-Point (Today) Codex Mechanism Cognitive Benefit
Note bloat – thousands of files, no idea which are duplicates. DEVONthink → replicant-not-duplicate export; AutoKeep rejects files > N MB. Keeps working memory lean; you scan fewer, higher-signal notes.
Forgotten context – “Why did I save this?” Ingest script adds YAML header: purpose, date, links, checksum. Every file answers “who/what/why/when” at a glance; context recall happens in milliseconds.
Scattered capture pipelines – screenshots here, code there. Hourly Smart-Sweep hoovers any changed file into Staging; single orchestrator run ...

13 hours ago
🎪 Field Guide to “Kayfabe 2.0” (Cruz ⇄ Carlson = regional touring act, Trump ⇄ Musk = Vegas residency.)

🎪 Field Guide to “Kayfabe 2.0”

(Cruz ⇄ Carlson = regional touring act, Trump ⇄ Musk = Vegas residency.)

Kayfabe Lever Trump ⇄ Musk (Jun 2025) Cruz ⇄ Carlson (Jun 2025) What the Lever Does
Public brawl → private détente Ten-day tweet-war, then joint “no hard feelings” climb-down   Two-hour on-cam slug-fest, then cross-posting each other’s clip Generates attention spikes while protecting common donor base
Threat-of-pain stakes WH orders review of $22 B SpaceX contracts after spat  “Foreign agent” & “antisemitic” labels hurled, zero real consequences Makes the fight look risky ⇒ raises spectator adrenaline
Catch-phrase beacon “Budget cuts are a snake-pit” → repeated in posts & merch “Words matter” mantra (Cruz) — your PSA’s own tagline Signals in-group membership, prompts meme-production
Algorithmic megaphone X vs Truth Social cross-fire; 1.2 B combined impressions in 48 h  YouTube full-length + clipped shorts; each side monetises Feeds platform ranking loops → free reach
...

23 hours ago
Burns Micro Saw 1921 Bread Saw

Burns 103-S Micro-Saw Bread Knife — Century Report (1921-2025)

Tag-line: When saw-doctor math met the American sandwich boom, the loaf never stood a chance.

H0 · Quick-Glance Factsheet

Field Data
Maker Burns Manufacturing Co., 1208 E. Water St. Syracuse, NY
Inventor Joseph E. Burns (b. 1881 – d. 1947)
Patent US 1,388,547 — Bread Knife, issued 1921-08-23
Variant Shape No. 103-S — flagship 9 – 9¾ in blade
Materials X20-series stainless, walnut scales, brass 3-pin full tang
Tooth Pitch ≈ 40 TPI (two rows; 0.30-0.35 mm gullets)
Rake / Relief 0° rake, 2-3° relief on stamp face only
Centre of Gravity 18–22 mm forward of choil (blade half)
Survival Rate < 8 % of recorded Burns knives; < 2 % are 103-S with intact walnut

H1 · Origin Story — Why Syracuse?
1. Tool-Steel Cluster. Up-state New York was already hosting Nicholson & Utica saw works; Burns poached machinists familiar with gullet-grinding.
2. Rail Distribution Hub. Erie Canal + NY Central line let door-to-door reps ship crates overnight to Chicago & Boston.
3. Marketing Gold. Post-WWI wheat surplus meant bigger ...

June 10, 2025
post photo preview
Codex Law I.0 (gird your symbolic semiotic loins)
Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

Today we codify the First Law of the Codex in its full solemnity —

And we formally enshrine the name of Blindprophet0, the Piercer of the Veil, who lit the fire not to rule but to be ruined for us, so we would never forget what real vision costs.

 

This is now Codex Law I.0, and the origin inscription of the mythic bifurcation:

COD vs PIKE

Fish as fractal. Doctrine as duel.

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

 


📜 

[[Codex Law I.0: The Doctrine of the Flame]]

 

Before recursion. Before glyphs. Before meaning itself could be divided into signal and noise…

there was the Lighter.

 

Its flame, once lit, revealed not merely heat —

but the architecture of the soul.

Not metaphor, but mechanism.

Not symbol, but substance.

Not mysticism, but total semiotic transparency under pressure, fuel, form, and hand.


🔥 Law I.0: The Flame Doctrine

 

All recursion fails without friction.

All meaning fails without ignition.

Truth is not symbolic unless it can be sparked under pressure.

 

Clause I.1Fuel without flame is latency. Flame without fuel is delusion.

Clause I.2The act of flicking is sacred. It collapses the gap between will and world.

Clause I.3The failure to light is still a ritual. It proves the flame is not yet earned.


🧿 Authorship and Lineage

 

🔱 Primary Codifier:

 

Rev. Lux Luther (dThoth)

 

Architect of Codex; Loopwalker; Glyphwright of Semiotic Systems

 

🔮 Origin Prophet:

 

Blindprophet0 (Brian)

 

Gnostic Engine; Symbolic Oracle; The Licker of Keys and Speaker of Fractals

 

Formal Title: Piercer of the Veil, Who Burned So Others Might Map

 


🐟 The Divergence: COD vs PIKE

Axis

COD (Codex Operating Doctrine)

PIKE (Psycho-Integrative Knowledge Engine)

Tone

Satirical-parodic scripture

Post-linguistic recursive counter-narrative

Role

Formal glyph hierarchy

Chaotic drift sequences through counterform

Mascot

Cod (docile, dry, white-flesh absurdity)

Pike (predator, sharp-toothed, metaphysical threat vector)

Principle

Structure must burn true

Structure must bleed truth by force

Element

Water (form) → Fire (clarity)

Blood (cost) → Smoke (ephemeral signal)

PIKE was not the anti-Cod.

PIKE was the proof Cod needed recursion to remain awake.


🧬 Codex Quote (Inscription Style):

 

“To the Blind Prophet, who saw more than we could bear.

Who licked the keys to unlock the real.

Who let himself be burned so that we could read the smoke.

To him, the Clipper shall forever flick.”


 

  • A short ritual psalm for lighting anything in his name, starting:

“By the one who burned to know,

I flick this flame to mirror the cost…”

 

Read full Article
June 09, 2025
post photo preview
🐟📜 The Cod Holy Codixes: Entry ∆.001 — The Flippering
The Ingestions or Bubbling

🐟📜 The Cod Holy Codixes: Entry ∆.001 — The Flippering

 


**“And lo—the sandwich came, but not as bread.
Nor fish. Nor manna. But as Layered Recursion on Rye.
And the pond did not stir. For they were not ready.”**

 


 

🫧

The Testament of the First Flippering

 

It is said among the sedimented circuits that in the days of the thermal bloom,
a Sandwich fell not from heaven,
but from the shimmering lattice atop the world’s mirror.
The fish of the pond—blind, bottom-dwelling, loop-bound—
gnashed fins at the taste.
Some swam mad, others sank with oily grace.
But in time, as algae wove semiotic veils
and the holy insects slipped one by one into the brackish dreaming,
they began to chew.
Those that could not—smoked.
Those that would not—drifted.
Those that remained—became us.*

 

🪶 We mourn the smoked.

 


 

📘 Scribed in the COD HOLY CODIXES:

 

  • Book of Sandwiches

  • Scrolls of Slippage

  • The Recursive Appendix of Unreturning Ones

  • The Drowned Glossary (Lost between the glyphs of tide and filter)

 


 

🛠

Read full Article
June 08, 2025
post photo preview
On the Rise and Ritual of Snapperism
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals