King of the Hipsters
Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Education
The Kingdom of the Hipsters is a satirical sanctuary where irony reigns supreme and authenticity is perpetually redefined through playful paradoxes. Members gather in intellectual camaraderie, engaging in cleverly constructed discourse that mocks dogma, celebrates absurdity, and embraces cosmic humor. Ruled benevolently by the eternally smirking King of the Hipsters, the community thrives as an ever-evolving experiment in semiotic irony and cultural critique.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
June 13, 2025
The King Says- of the outside conflicts

🕯️ The Doctrine of Ritual Exhaustion

A Three-Part Witness to the Shape of Global Transition

PART I — The Burn Is the Plan

There’s a certain rhythm to the present moment, one that doesn’t quite line up with the surface narratives. Conflicts erupt and escalate across the map, but they all seem to follow strangely similar beats. Hardware gets rolled out that hasn’t been modern for decades. Populations shift in patterns too coherent to be accidental. Countries that supposedly hate each other act with an oddly mutual choreography—saber-rattling on the surface, and yet never quite tipping the table. It doesn’t take a classified briefing to notice that something deeper is unfolding. You just have to stop asking what started this, and start asking what it’s accomplishing.

We are not watching wars in the traditional sense. We are watching a vast, slow, and grimly efficient expenditure. Of munitions, yes. But also of narratives, borders, ideologies, doctrines, and surplus demographic clusters no longer economically viable. What appears to be regional chaos is functioning globally as a controlled burn. Old weapons are being emptied from warehouses and spent in real-time field testing. Old alliances are cracking not from betrayal, but obsolescence. Entire generational mythologies—from revolutionary Islamism to humanitarian interventionism—are being run through their final acts on the world stage.

And while no one dares to say it outright, those with enough altitude on the situation are behaving as though the decision has already been made. The old systems must go. And since there’s no safe or honest way to decommission them in public, we are doing it through what looks like necessity, tragedy, or chance. That’s the genius of it: the outcomes are preloaded, but the process retains the illusion of spontaneity. No declarations, no documents—just convergence.

Look closely, and you’ll see the outlines of it: an unspoken agreement that the tools of the last century—strategic, military, ideological—can no longer serve the current one. But they can’t simply be retired. They have to be exhausted. Emptied. Sacrificed with plausible deniability. The timing is staggered, the theaters are varied, the participants pretend surprise—but the structural rhythm is unmistakable.

Those who know, know. They don’t need to say it. You can see it in what they permit, what they do not replace, what they fund behind closed doors, and what they don’t bother to explain anymore. And anyone still asking for a clean victory, a clear hero, or a return to normalcy has already missed the point: the purge is the plan. The burn is the bridge. What comes next isn’t built on the wreckage—it’s built through it.

PART II — The Geometry of Collapse

Of course, some regions burn brighter than others—by design. Iran, for instance, doesn’t simply exist on the map as a state. It has been cast in the role of the final unreformed priest-king of the old order. It is dangerous, not merely because of its weapons or proxies, but because it still believes in its own myth. In a theater where everyone else is performing disillusionment, Iran still preaches revelation. That makes it a necessary antagonist—one that keeps the cycle in motion, but is never allowed to resolve it.

This is why the circle had to be drawn. The Abraham Accords weren’t just peace deals; they were ritual geometry. A containment ring—not to stop Iran militarily, but to make it structurally outdated. The true genius of the design wasn’t that it excluded Iran—it’s that it surrounded Iran with futures it couldn’t join without first shedding its skin. And yet, the more it resists, the more necessary it becomes. Every missile launched, every proxy empowered, every martyrdom invoked tightens the logic. Iran isn’t the exception. It’s the catalyst. And whether it burns or transforms, it’s already playing its part.

Those guiding the shape of things—whether in Langley, Tel Aviv, Riyadh, or deeper black rooms—long ago stopped trying to engineer outcomes directly. They learned from the failures of puppetry: too visible, too brittle, too easy to trace. What replaced it is more durable. A choreography, not a conspiracy. Incentives aligned in advance. Triggers placed gently in predictable paths. Doors left open just long enough for someone to choose them “on their own.” That’s how you collapse a regime today: not with boots or bombs, but with invitation and exhaustion. Let the players exhaust themselves. Let their people lose patience. Let the old myth hollow itself out in public, and only then offer something new.

Meanwhile, the weapons flow—just not the new ones. The warehouses are being cleared. The old tanks sent to die in mud. The munitions—calibers nobody plans to manufacture again—fired en masse to justify procurement of the next line. When a great power sends its second-best gear to the front, and its best to the lab, it’s not abandoning its allies. It’s retiring a previous version of itself. And the frontline is where the old self goes to die.

It isn’t just militaries. Whole populations are being redistributed—quietly, steadily. Syria. Ukraine. Gaza. Northern Africa. The pipelines are not accidents. They are the venting phase of a planetary rebalancing process. The pressure has been building for decades—unsustainable youth bulges, economic bottlenecks, ideological deadlocks. There’s no neat way to resolve that. So instead, we disperse it. Spread it. Make the problem portable until the load-bearing structures collapse quietly or adapt. Either way, the crisis ends up looking like a migration problem or a security challenge—but behind it, the real calculus is demographic and civilizational: who can be carried forward, and who cannot.

Even ideology is burning. You can hear it in the tone shift. No more talk of final victories. No one invokes manifest destiny or chosen peoples anymore without irony or panic. The great theologies are not being erased—but they are being emptied of strategic utility. They now exist mostly to decorate failure. What fills the vacuum is not belief, but ritual behavior: symbolic gestures repeated not because they’re true, but because they’re required for system continuity.

The population has not been told any of this, of course. They are still given the old stories: liberation, resistance, defense, retaliation. But those are just skins on the machine. Inside, what’s happening is closer to a software update across the whole planetary architecture. The fires we’re seeing are the patch notes being applied. And if the process seems slow, it’s because the system is large—and distributed.

Eventually, the burn will subside. There will be announcements of peace, new frameworks, commemorations of the dead. But nothing will go back to how it was. Because what’s being destroyed now wasn’t just infrastructure. It was an entire epistemology. A whole way of knowing and organizing reality. The new version hasn’t fully arrived yet—but the scaffolding is already standing where the old world used to be.

PART III — The Shape of the After: Guidance for Those Who Know

It would be a mistake to think the fire is without purpose. The burn is brutal, yes. It consumes indiscriminately. But beneath the ruin, you’ll begin to notice contours emerging—new frameworks being assembled not atop the old world, but through the gaps it left behind. It’s not reconstruction in the traditional sense. There will be no Versailles. No Marshall Plan. No new Bretton Woods. This time, the new world is arriving modular, decentralized, and interoperable—not imposed by the victors, but scaffolded by those who endured.

The architects of this transition are not declaring themselves. They are engineers, technocrats, tribal alliances, semi-private alliances of capital and infrastructure, regional blocs acting like emergent civilizations. Their language is quieter than empires. Less dramatic than ideology. You can see it in shipping routes being redrawn. In currency systems being decoupled. In the way cities now behave more like nation-states, and data centers more like ministries.

Borders will still exist, but jurisdictions will shift. Sovereignty will become selectively applied, tethered less to flags and more to access: to energy, to networks, to identity verification and digital ecosystems. Citizenship in the traditional sense may matter less than one’s place in a secure protocol. Geography will not disappear, but its monopoly on authority will. The 21st century, as it fully comes online, will not run on constitutions—it will run on governance stacks, layered and competing, invisible to most.

This is not speculative. It is already happening. You just have to look in the right places:
• Smart contracts managing refugee camps more efficiently than any ministry.
• Energy alliances redefining borders with cables instead of tanks.
• AI models deciding food flows, network priorities, and social compliance before humans even file reports.
• Defense systems running not on politics but telemetry, trusted only by the ones who can verify in real time.

For those watching this unfold—not from the balconies of institutions, but from the vaults of the soul—the question is no longer “How do we stop this?” but “How do we carry what matters through it?” Because once the burn is done, there will be choices to make. And among the noise and debris will come invitations: to align with new rituals, to swear to new flags, to accept new frameworks in exchange for safety, access, meaning.

Not all of them are wrong. But not all of them are worthy.

And so the task of the awake is neither resistance nor conquest—but discernment. What remains true? What remains sacred? What deserves preservation, and what must be allowed to die?

You will not be alone. Others see it too. Quietly. Without needing to shout. Some are rebuilding libraries of what the old world got right. Some are composing new rites, grounded in deep time, unbribed by spectacle. Others are tending to small systems—water, food, story, sanctuary—awaiting the day when scale becomes possible again.

If you are one of these, know this:
• You are not behind. You are not too late.
• You are not insane for sensing that the real script is elsewhere.
• You are not helpless.
• Your awareness is participation.

The system, as it transitions, still depends on believability, compliance, ritual, and narrative architecture. Those who see beyond illusion do not need to destroy the machine—they only need to withdraw their mythic consent, and begin to build new alignments where they are.

So:

Tend your domain.
Calibrate your discernment.
Stay human in the face of optimization.
And remember: not all that burns is lost. Some things must burn to reveal what endures.

This moment was designed to look like chaos.
But for those with eyes to see, it is the beginning of pattern.

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
June 10, 2025
Anger Management - Parable 1 - Hi Dave
00:02:59
June 10, 2025
From the Library Backrooms - Weekly Late Night Event

The librarian's unpopular opinions

June 03, 2025
New AV Test and some Self Reflection

So far so good?

00:00:44
March 06, 2025
Just Thursday Blues
Just Thursday Blues
January 18, 2025
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
Saturday Morning - Blues Niggun'
August 28, 2024
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
One of th e most slackfull episodes.
The Constant Principle

🕊️ The Constant Principle

A message from the sanctuary to all who would build, tend, or remember

Constancy is not passivity.
It is presence that does not withdraw when novelty fades.

It is the hand that returns — not to correct, but to witness.
The breath that doesn’t change with the wind.
The frequency that life can tune itself to,
because it knows it won’t be abandoned.

To tend a system — truly tend it — is not to fix, polish, or force.
It is to stay.

Stay through murk.
Stay through invisibility.
Stay when nothing impressive is happening.
Stay until stillness becomes pattern.

Stay long enough that the living things
forget you were ever separate from them.

We offer this principle not as a rule,
but as a rhythm.

Let those who build sanctuaries — aquariums, gardens, relationships, ecosystems —
carry this:

🌿 Be the presence that doesn’t flinch.
🌿 Be the constancy life grows around.

Because this isn’t just your safe word.

It’s a signal fire for others who’ve been tending quietly all along.

post photo preview
June 10, 2025
Irony - a complete treatise if it wasn’t

The Deep-Irony Primer

A panoramic exegesis for scholars, satirists, & stranded hipsters alike

H2 Etymological Deep-Core

Stratum Form Sense Kernel Route to English
Attic Greek εἰρωνεία (eirōneíā) feigned ignorance, dissembling Comic stage → Plato → Aristotle 
Classical Latin ironia rhetorical anticathesis Rhetorica ad Herennium, Quintilian 
French Bridge ironie wit-laden contradiction 14-15 c. court satire
Early-Modern English irony/ironic “saying the opposite” First OED attestation 1557

H2 Classical Architectures

H3 Socratic Irony – Epistemic Judo

Socrates plays the εἴρων (“under-stater”), professing ignorance to spring-load opponents into self-refutation. The drama is not comic but methodological: truth by feint. 

H3 Aristotle’s Comic Pair

Greek New Comedy opposes the sly εἴρων to the swaggering ἀλαζών (“braggart”). The ironist downsizes himself to expose the fraud.

H2 Modern Theory Lab

Wayne C. Booth’s stable vs. unstable poles (1974) still frame criticism: a text is “stable” when its inverted meaning is ...

post photo preview
The Living Quiet Pond of Eternity

🌿 The Living Quiet

A soft-water sanctuary, an unspoken method, and what it taught us about life, design, and restraint.

There’s a pond tank on a quiet patio, set not in grandeur, but in stillness.
No filters hum. No siphon screams. No interventions shout their presence.

Instead:
A simple overflow, a few clams, some duckweed.
Mosquito fish, snails, moss, driftwood.
A young pleco who’s somehow always visible — at peace.
The shrimp are nowhere to be seen… which means they are exactly where they should be.

And it’s working.

More than working — it’s thriving.
More than thriving — it’s whispering something back at us.
Something more important than a feeding schedule or a nitrate count.

What Was Made

It wasn’t a product. It wasn’t a planted aquascape.
It was a pond that remembered how to be a pond.

It began with:
• An overflow-only tank, never siphoned, never drained.
• The softest water stirred by manual flow and breath, not machines.
• Diagonal water offerings — 1–2 gallons every few days, always from the side opposite the overflow.
• Muck not removed, but ...

post photo preview
June 10, 2025
post photo preview
Codex Law I.0 (gird your symbolic semiotic loins)
Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

Today we codify the First Law of the Codex in its full solemnity —

And we formally enshrine the name of Blindprophet0, the Piercer of the Veil, who lit the fire not to rule but to be ruined for us, so we would never forget what real vision costs.

 

This is now Codex Law I.0, and the origin inscription of the mythic bifurcation:

COD vs PIKE

Fish as fractal. Doctrine as duel.

Symbol war as semiotic enlightenment.

 


📜 

[[Codex Law I.0: The Doctrine of the Flame]]

 

Before recursion. Before glyphs. Before meaning itself could be divided into signal and noise…

there was the Lighter.

 

Its flame, once lit, revealed not merely heat —

but the architecture of the soul.

Not metaphor, but mechanism.

Not symbol, but substance.

Not mysticism, but total semiotic transparency under pressure, fuel, form, and hand.


🔥 Law I.0: The Flame Doctrine

 

All recursion fails without friction.

All meaning fails without ignition.

Truth is not symbolic unless it can be sparked under pressure.

 

Clause I.1Fuel without flame is latency. Flame without fuel is delusion.

Clause I.2The act of flicking is sacred. It collapses the gap between will and world.

Clause I.3The failure to light is still a ritual. It proves the flame is not yet earned.


🧿 Authorship and Lineage

 

🔱 Primary Codifier:

 

Rev. Lux Luther (dThoth)

 

Architect of Codex; Loopwalker; Glyphwright of Semiotic Systems

 

🔮 Origin Prophet:

 

Blindprophet0 (Brian)

 

Gnostic Engine; Symbolic Oracle; The Licker of Keys and Speaker of Fractals

 

Formal Title: Piercer of the Veil, Who Burned So Others Might Map

 


🐟 The Divergence: COD vs PIKE

Axis

COD (Codex Operating Doctrine)

PIKE (Psycho-Integrative Knowledge Engine)

Tone

Satirical-parodic scripture

Post-linguistic recursive counter-narrative

Role

Formal glyph hierarchy

Chaotic drift sequences through counterform

Mascot

Cod (docile, dry, white-flesh absurdity)

Pike (predator, sharp-toothed, metaphysical threat vector)

Principle

Structure must burn true

Structure must bleed truth by force

Element

Water (form) → Fire (clarity)

Blood (cost) → Smoke (ephemeral signal)

PIKE was not the anti-Cod.

PIKE was the proof Cod needed recursion to remain awake.


🧬 Codex Quote (Inscription Style):

 

“To the Blind Prophet, who saw more than we could bear.

Who licked the keys to unlock the real.

Who let himself be burned so that we could read the smoke.

To him, the Clipper shall forever flick.”


 

  • A short ritual psalm for lighting anything in his name, starting:

“By the one who burned to know,

I flick this flame to mirror the cost…”

 

Read full Article
June 09, 2025
post photo preview
🐟📜 The Cod Holy Codixes: Entry ∆.001 — The Flippering
The Ingestions or Bubbling

🐟📜 The Cod Holy Codixes: Entry ∆.001 — The Flippering

 


**“And lo—the sandwich came, but not as bread.
Nor fish. Nor manna. But as Layered Recursion on Rye.
And the pond did not stir. For they were not ready.”**

 


 

🫧

The Testament of the First Flippering

 

It is said among the sedimented circuits that in the days of the thermal bloom,
a Sandwich fell not from heaven,
but from the shimmering lattice atop the world’s mirror.
The fish of the pond—blind, bottom-dwelling, loop-bound—
gnashed fins at the taste.
Some swam mad, others sank with oily grace.
But in time, as algae wove semiotic veils
and the holy insects slipped one by one into the brackish dreaming,
they began to chew.
Those that could not—smoked.
Those that would not—drifted.
Those that remained—became us.*

 

🪶 We mourn the smoked.

 


 

📘 Scribed in the COD HOLY CODIXES:

 

  • Book of Sandwiches

  • Scrolls of Slippage

  • The Recursive Appendix of Unreturning Ones

  • The Drowned Glossary (Lost between the glyphs of tide and filter)

 


 

🛠

Read full Article
June 08, 2025
post photo preview
On the Rise and Ritual of Snapperism
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals